The falling away was foretold in the following language:
"Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our
Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,
that ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled,
neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us,
as that the day of Christ is at hand. Let no man deceive
you by any means: for that day shall not come, except
there come a falling away first, and that; man of sin be
revealed, the son of perdition; who opposeth and exalteth
himself above all that is called God, or that is
worshiped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God,
showing himself that he is God." "For the
mystery of iniquity cloth already work: only he who now
letteth will let, until he is taken out of the way. "
"Even him, whose coming, is after the working of
Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, and with
all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish;
because they received not the love of the truth, that they
might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them
strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: that they
all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had
pleasure in unrighteousness. " 2 Thess. 2: 1-4, 7,
9-12.
Some of the Thessalonian brethren,
it seems, had an idea that the second advent of Christ
would take place in their day; but the apostle disabused
their minds of that idea by assuring them that before that
day there would come a falling away. What can this mean
but an apostasy, a retrogration from the pure apostolic
plane? The apostles saw this thing only a little way ahead
of them. This falling away is the same as that predicted
in 1 Tim. 4:1-3, where it is said, "Some shall depart
from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and
doctrines of devils. " " The faith once
delivered to the saints" was the pure faith of the
gospel. This faith taught but one God, but one Lord Jesus
Christ (Eph. 4: 5, 6). At a very early time heresies were
introduced, teaching a plurality of gods in heaven above
and that Christ and Jesus were two separate persons. This
theory was taught by many, and thousands were led away
into this mythology anti were never reclaimed. An account
of these heresies will be found in the writings of
Irenaeus. He wrote his notable work between A. D. 182 and
189.
Through the faith of the gospel people
received full salvation from sin and found grace to live
free from sin. They entered tile holiest and were made
perfect through sanctification. Through faith in the name
of Jesus the sick were headed of all their diseases, the
dame were made to walk, the blind to see, the deaf to
hear, and the dumb to speak; devils were cast out; and
great power and grace rested upon the entire church.
The reader can readily judge what
the result was when men fell away from that faith; they
lost all the foregoing blessings from God. So it can
easily be seen how such a departure and falling away
brought darkness and superstition and all conceivable
doctrines of devils into the world. The ordinances were
corrupter! soon after the apostles' death. Feet washing
Noms lowered from a church ordinance to a practice in the
home, to a mere act of hospitality. Baptism also was
corrupted. In case of sickness, sprinkling and rubbing
were substituted for immersion. Oil was sometimes used
instead of water. At times the candidates were divested of
all clothing. About Tertullian's time triune immersion
took the place of single immersion.
The faith of the gospel teaches
that there is one fold, one body— the body of Christ,
which is the church; that salvation constitutes us living
members of the same; that these members have one mind, one
doctrine, are all of one heart and of one soul: but when
men fell away from that blessed state of unity, it became
necessary for them to be identified with some other body,
to enter some other fold and adhere to contrary doctrines.
Thus it was that an apostate church was organized in the
earth.
We have already seen the humble
equality of the apostolic ministry. As the saints began to
fall away and drift from the primitive faith, they lost
sight of this humble equality and exalted man, as seen in
Second Thessalonians. Paul said that the mystery of
iniquity was already working. The spirit of it was then
seen in some. In John's time it was in public
manifestation. In the third epistle of John it is evident
that three elders of the church are spoken of; namely,
Gaius, Demetrius, and Diotrephes. The first two he
commended. They were straight, humble men. But Diotrephes
loved to have the preeminence among them. He no doubt
wanted to be a bishop, to be higher than the common
presbytery. He did not want to receive the apostle John
(verse 9). He knew that John was against any such
exaltation. But John comforted Gaius by saying, "
When I come, I will remember his deeds." Verse 10.
Here is the first mention in Scripture of one man seeking
preeminence above the other elders in the local assembly,
seeking a position over the others. This was A. D. 90.
Just as soon, however, as we pass l beyond the sacred
writings, in the second century, we find a man exalted to
a higher office—a bishop over the common presbyters or
elders. This was apostasy already at work.
I will here quote from the Church
Fathers to show that in their early day, one man had been
already exalted above the rest. Instead of elders and
deacons, as the New Testament reads, it was one bishop,
elders, and deacons; three classes of officers instead of
two; one over the rest.
"Wherefore it is fitting that
ye should run together in accordance with the will of your
bishop, which thing also ye do. For your justly renowned
presbytery, worthy of God, is fitted as exactly to the
bishop as the strings are to the harp. "—Ignatius
to the Ephesians, Chap. IV. "Since, then, I have had
the privilege of seeing you, through Damas your most t
worthy bishop, and through y our worthy presbyters Bassus
aIid A pollonius, and through my fellow servant the deacon
Sotio."—Ignatius to the Magnesians, Chap. II.
"There is but one altar for the whole church, and one
bishop with the presbytery and deacons." Ignatius to
the Philadelphians, Chap. IV. "Give heed to the
bishop, and to the presbytery, and deacons." —Chap.
VII. "'I he bishop, and the presbyters, and the
deacons."—Ignatius to Polycarp, Chap. VI.
The above quotations from Ignatius,
who wrote in the first part of the second century, show
that at that early date the humble equality of the
apostolic order was already inverted and a third office
created, by exalting in each local congregation one man as
bishop over the common elders, or presbyters. How
differently the above quotations read from the sacred
Scriptures! At Philippi, Paul addressed the bishops and
deacons, but Ignatius taught that at the time of his
writing there was "one bishop, with the presbyters
and deacons." When Paul sent to Ephesus and called
together the local preachers, he called the "elders
of the church"; but when Ignatius wrote, he would
have had to call the bishop and the elders. When Paul left
Titus in Crete, he was to ordain elders in every city; but
when Ignatius wrote, he would have had to ordain "a
bishop and elders." Ah, beloved reader, this is the
" mystery of iniquity. " It Noms the first big
step toward the man of sin. tits soon as this third office
was created and in each assembly one bishop set up over
the elders and the deacons, the next step was to confer
great honors upon him; to exalt him high above all others.
Ignatius, in the latter part of his ministry, was drunk on
this spirit.
I will again quote: "As
therefore the Lord does nothing without the Father, . . .
so do ye, neither presbyter, nor deacon, nor lawman, do
anything without the bishop."—Ignatius to the
Magnesians, Chap VII. " In like manner, let all
reverence the deacons as an appointment of Jesus Christ,
and the bishop as Jesus Christ who is the Son of the
Father, and the presbyters as the sanhedrin of God, and
assembly of the apostles. Apart from these there is no
church. " —Ignatius to the Trallians, Chap. III.
"And do ye also reverence your bishop as Christ
himself. . . . For what is the bishop but one who beyond
all others possesses all power and authority, so far as it
is possible for man to possess it, who according to his
ability has been made an imitator of the Christ of God?
And what is the presbytery but a sacred assembly, the
counselors and assessors of the bishop?"—Chap. VII.
" Reverence your bishop as
Jesus Christ" and "do nothing without the
bishop"—that is getting him pretty high. But such
was the spirit then at work. In the early church, the
presbytery was an assembly of ministers. It a number of
local preachers assembled, they constituted a presbytery;
or a gathering of both traveling and local elders, as at
Jerusalem (Acts 15), was properly termed a presbytery: but
when Ignatius wrote, they were common elders who served as
counselors and assessors of the bishop. Oh, how changed!
Humble equality was lost sight of.
" Let governors be obedient to
Caesar; soldiers, to those that command them; deacons, to
the presbyters, as to high priests; the presbyters, and
deacons, and the rest of the clergy, together with all the
people, and the soldiers, and the governors, and Caesar
himself, to the bishop. "—Ignatius to the
Philadelphians, Chap. IV. If this was not making great
strides toward popery, I can not understand language. The
bishop was exalted above all "the clergy," even
above Caesar himself, and this in the second century. Such
was the teaching of Ignatius. Surely the great apostasy
came early. The people of God's holiness possessed it but
"a little while." Of course the bishop had not,
in reality, yet reached such a high place, but the people
were working hard to get him there, and Ignatius' writings
show that he believed such was his place.
Again we quote: " See that ye
follow the bishop, even as Jesus does the Father, and the
presbytery as ye would the apostles; and reverence the
deacons, as being the institution of God. Let no man do
anything connected with the church without the bishop. Let
that be deemed a proper Eucharist which is administered
either by the bishop or by one to whom he has entrusted
it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the
multitude of the people also be; even as, wherever Jesus
Christ is, there is the Catholic church. It is not lawful
without the bishop either to baptize or to celebrate a
lovefeast, but whatever he shall approve of, that is also
pleasing to God."—Ignatius to the Smyrnians, Chap.
VIII. " He who honors the bishop has been honored by
God; he who does anything without the knowledge of the
bishop, does in reality serve the devil." "Nor
is there any one in the church greater than the
bishop." "He who honors the bishop shall be
honored by God." "Let the laity be subject to
the deacons; the deacons to the presbyters; the presbyters
to the bishops. "—Chap. I X. " If he reckon
himself greater than the bishop, he is ruined. But it
becomes both men and women who marry, to form their union
with the approval of the bishop."—Ignatius to
Polycarp, Chap. V.
Thus we have given a few quotations
from the early writings to show how soon the humble
equality of the apostolic government was overthrown and
man exalted. This kept working more and more. The bishop
was lifted up higher and higher, until about the third
century; then a higher office was created. After that date
we have a class of officers called archbishops—bishops
over other bishops. Sometimes one bishop would rule over
the bishops of a score of churches. This was forming the
man of sin. In the church of God there is but one chief
shepherd, one chief bishop—Christ— but at this date
there was an exalting of man to this lofty position. This
kept on working and fomenting, man being exalted higher
and higher until finally the pope was elected head of the
church—so-called. Instead of Christ's working all in
all, in all the members, man power-ruled the church.
2 Thess. 2: 3 is rendered in the
Emphatic Diaglott as follows: "Let no one delude you
by any means, because the apostasy must come first, and
there must be revealed that man of sin, that son of
destruction." "Falling away" is from
apostasia. Another form of this word— the neuter gender,
apostasion—is found in Matt. 19: 7; Mark 10: 4; and
Matt. 5: 31. Here it is translated " divorcement.
" This form of the word—apostasion—signifies the
bill of divorcement, the giving of writing, which effects
complete separation. But apostasia, the word in 2 Thess.
2: 3, is a feminine use of the word, and signifies the
real separation or departure rather than the giving of a
bill. Therefore 2 Thess.2:3, properly rendered, would
read, "The departure or separation must first
come."
The apostate condition of the
church is, in Scripture, viewed from different standpoints
in order to bring out its different phases. That part of
the divine ecclesia which departed from the Lord, fell
away from the plain of eternal truth, was separated from
him. This thought I will take up briefly. The church of
God is represented in Scripture as a bride. The blessed
union between the Lord and his people is expressed by the
term "marriage." In Isa. 62: 1-5 the prophet
speaks of the new testament church under the metaphors of
" Zion " and " Jerusalem," and says
that is she to be termed Beulah—married. " Thy land
shall be married." It was seen that "as a
bridegroom rejoiceth over his bride," so God would
rejoice over his people—a clear prediction of the new
testament church. The Gentiles were to help compose this
bride, and, as a result of this new happy union, she was
to be called by a "new name." How clear! As soon
as the marriage takes place, the maiden drops her name and
is called by a new name, the name of her husband. So with
the church. After this blessed union, whatever we do in
word, thought, or deed, we do "all in the name of the
Lord" (1 (Cor. 3:17). The wife, in order to honor her
husband, must bear his name. To take upon her another
man's name is to dishonor her husband and to make herself
an adulteress. Just so with the church. In order to honor
her husband, she must bear his name; to take upon her
another name is to make herself a spiritual adulteress.
Millennialists generally contend
that a state of marriage does not now exist. If that is
true, then we are bastards and not legitimate children.
Thus it has been discovered by these preachers that the
apostle John was mistaken when he said, "Beloved, now
are we the sons of God." The reader will remember
that in a former chapter I have treated the different
figures of marriage used in the Bible, and that in one of
them God is now a husband and father to his people. It
will be remembered that the church was seen in Rev. 12: 1
as a woman clothed with the sun, and having upon her head
a crown adorned with twelve stars. How beautifully was
that bride robed in holiness, in the garments of
salvation. She sat a queen. A crown upon her head denoted
her royalty. Her husband was the King of heaven and earth,
King of kings, and Lord of lords. He was crowned with
glory and honor (Heb. 2: 9). But he also crowned her with
his glory. " The glory which thou hast given me I
have given them." John 17: 22. Thus the church sat
and reigned a queen. The time came, however, when
thousands upon thousands among the Christians departed
from the Lord.
The church at Rome was once a
congregation of saints. Paul was one of the leading
ministers who were instrumental in establishing and
planting that assembly. After the death of Paul, Linus,
who is mentioned in 2 Tim. 4: 21, became bishop, or
overseer, of that assembly. But in afteryears when
they began to exalt bishops over the elders, and finally
one bishop over another bishop, the bishop of Rome, being
located in the imperial city, thought he ought to have
authority over the other bishops. Erelong the bishops of
the Western churches submitted to that order, and thus the
papacy was established. You see, these assemblies were
originally pure churches of God, but they departed from
the simple government of Christ and the apostles, and thus
became apostate.
Viewing the condition of affairs
during the Dark Ages from this standpoint, we behold the
church at Rome an apostate church. Thus was fulfilled the
prophecy of Isa. 1:21: "How is the faithful city
become an harlot? It was full of judgment; righteousness
lodged in it, but now murders." The very
congregations that were once pure churches of God
departed, fell away from, the faith of the gospel, and out
of them grew the apostate church—the church of Rome. The
prophets, viewing this particular phase of the apostasy,
saw the church turning degenerate. The faithful city, once
full of righteousness, represents the primitive church, in
the morning glory of this dispensation. She became a
harlot by departing from the Lord; that is, that part of
the church which apostatized became a harlot, forsook
Christ, and thus the pope became her husband. She played
the harlot and committed fornication. This was the great
separation expressed by apostasy. She departed from Christ
her living head, and that apostate woman he never
acknowledged as his wife.
"For of old time I have broken
thy yoke, and burst thy hands; and thou saidst I will not
transgress; when upon every high hill and under every
green tree thou wanderest, playing the harlot. Yet I had
planted thee a noble vine, wholly a right seed: how then
art thou turned into the degenerate plant of a strange
vine unto me?" Jer. 2: 20, 21. While this had its
partial fulfillment in Israel's departing from God, yet it
has an application to the church of God, for one is a type
of the other. "I planted thee a noble vine, wholly a
right seed. " Such was the pure church of God planted
by Christ, her divine founder and head; but by falling
away she departed from him, played the harlot, became
degenerate, a strange vine. "Surely as a wife
treacherously departeth from her husband, so have ye dealt
treacherously with me. " Jer. 3: 20. " Thou hast
played the harlot with many lovers." Jer. 3:1.
"Plead with your mother, plead; for she is not my
wife, neither am I thy husband: let her, therefore, put
away her whoredoms out of her sight, and her adulteries
from between her breasts; . . . For their mother hath
played the harlot: she that conceived them hath done
shamefully: for she said, I will go after my lovers, that
give me my bread and my water, my wool and my flax, mine
oil and my drink." Hos. 2: 2, 5. While these
scriptures were fulfilled in Judah's and Israel's
apostasy, and had direct reference to that time, they
indirectly reached a fulfillment in the apostasy of the
church, for Israel was a type of the church. Israel was
planted "a noble vine"; but she treacherously
departed from the Lord, went into open idolatry, committed
adultery with stones and stocks. She played the harlot
with many lovers, and the land was greatly polluted. For
this cause the Lord put her away and gave her a bill of
divorcement. " Thus saith the Lord, Where is the bill
of your mother's divorcement, whom I have put away? or
which of my creditors is it to whom I have sold you?
Behold, for your iniquities have ye sold yourselves, and
for your transgressions is your mother put away. "
Isa. 50: 1.
In the legal dispensation, when a
man put away his wife, he gave her a bill of divorcement.
So the Lord uses this language to express the condition of
Israel when she forsook him. He no longer recognized her
as his wife, or people. This is expressed by divorcement.
IN this dispensation, however, divorcing is not
recognized. The divorce law was abolished. Nevertheless,
for one certain cause —fornication—a man may put away
his wife— separate. Now, just as Israel departed fromGod,
the faithful city, Zion, "departed from her husband
and became a harlot. " She committed fornication,
became " a great whore. " The Lord could not
acknowledge her in this condition as his wife; this is
expressed by apostasia —separation. Thus we learn
what Paul meant when he said the falling away—departure,
apostasia, separation—shall first come before the end.
It came, and Israel's apostasy was a type of it.
The apostate church is brought to
view in Revelation 17 under the symbol of a corrupt woman
having a golden cup in her hand, full of abominations and
filthiness of her fornications. She is called
"Babylon the great, the mother of harlots. "
This corrupt woman is not the bride of Christ. There is no
communication with the living head. She apostatized—
separated from the truth, played the harlot— and at last
she will have her portion in the lake of fire and
brimstone. This is the great apostasy.