| |
THE GOSPEL
ACCORDING TO
MATTHEW
Commentary by DAVID BROWN
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
CHAPTER 17
@Mt
17:1-13. JESUS IS TRANSFIGURED--CONVERSATION ABOUT
ELIAS. ( = @Mr
9:2-13 Lu 9:28-36).
For the exposition, see on Lu
9:28-36.
@Mt
17:14-23. HEALING OF A DEMONIAC BOY--SECOND EXPLICIT
ANNOUNCEMENT BY OUR LORD OF HIS APPROACHING DEATH AND
RESURRECTION. ( = @Mr
9:14-32 Lu 9:37-45).
The time of this section is sufficiently denoted by the
events which all the narratives show to have immediately
preceded it--the first explicit announcement of His death,
and the transfiguration--both being between His third and
His fourth and last Passover.
Healing of the Demoniac and Lunatic Boy (@Mt
17:14-21).
For the exposition of this portion, see on Mr
9:14-32.
Second Announcement of His Death (@Mt
17:22,23).
22. And while they abode in Galilee, Jesus said unto
them--Mark (@Mr
9:30), as usual, is very precise here: "And they
departed thence"--that is, from the scene of the last
miracle--"and passed through Galilee; and He would
not that any man should know it." So this was not a
preaching, but a private, journey through Galilee. Indeed,
His public ministry in Galilee was now all but concluded.
Though He sent out the Seventy after this to preach and
heal, He Himself was little more in public there, and He
was soon to bid it a final adieu. Till this hour arrived,
He was chiefly occupied with the Twelve, preparing them
for the coming events.
The Son of man shall be
betrayed into the hands of men . . . And they
were exceeding sorry--Though the shock would not be so
great as at the first announcement (@Mt
16:21,22), their "sorrow" would not be the
less, but probably the greater, the deeper the
intelligence went down into their hearts, and a new wave
dashing upon them by this repetition of the heavy tidings.
Accordingly, Luke (@Lu
9:43,44), connecting it with the scene of the miracle
just recorded, and the teaching which arose out of it--or
possibly with all His recent teaching--says our Lord
forewarned the Twelve that they would soon stand in need
of all that teaching: "But while they wondered every
one at all things which Jesus did, He said unto His
disciples, Let these sayings sink down into your ears; for
the Son of man shall be delivered," &c.: "Be
not carried off your feet by the grandeur you have lately
seen in Me, but remember what I have told you, and now
tell you again, that that Sun in whose beams ye now
rejoice is soon to set in midnight gloom." Remarkable
is the antithesis in those words of our Lord preserved in
all the three narratives--"The son of man
shall be betrayed into the hands of men." Luke
adds (@Lu
9:45) that "they understood not this saying, and
it was hid from them, that they perceived it
not"--for the plainest statements, when they
encounter long-continued and obstinate prejudices, are
seen through a distorting and dulling medium--"and
were afraid to ask Him"; deterred partly by the air
of lofty sadness with which doubtless these sayings were
uttered, and on which they would be reluctant to break in,
and partly by the fear of laying themselves open to rebuke
for their shallowness and timidity. How artless is all
this!
@Mt
17:24-27. THE TRIBUTE MONEY.
The time of this section is evidently in immediate
succession to that of the preceding one. The brief but
most pregnant incident which it records is given by
Matthew alone--for whom, no doubt, it would have a
peculiar interest, from its relation to his own town and
his own familiar lake.
24. And when they were come to Capernaum, they that
received tribute money--the double drachma; a sum
equal to two Attic drachmas, and corresponding to the
Jewish "half-shekel," payable, towards the
maintenance of the temple and its services, by every male
Jew of twenty years old and upward. For the origin of this
annual tax, see @Ex
30:13,14 2Ch 24:6,9. Thus, it will be observed, it was
not a civil, but an ecclesiastical tax. The tax mentioned
in @Mt
17:25 was a civil one. The whole teaching of this very
remarkable scene depends upon this distinction.
came to Peter--at
whose house Jesus probably resided while at Capernaum.
This explains several things in the narrative.
and said, Doth not your
master pay tribute?--The question seems to imply that
the payment of this tax was voluntary, but expected;
or what, in modern phrase, would be called a
"voluntary assessment."
25. He saith, yes--that is, "To be sure He
does"; as if eager to remove even the suspicion of
the contrary. If Peter knew--as surely he did--that there
was at this time no money in the bag, this reply must be
regarded as a great act of faith in his Master.
And when he was come
into the house--Peter's.
Jesus prevented him--anticipated
him; according to the old sense of the word
"prevent."
saying, What thinkest
thou, Simon?--using his family name for familiarity.
of whom do the kings of
the earth take custom--meaning custom on goods
exported or imported.
or tribute--meaning
the poll-tax, payable to the Romans by everyone whose name
was in the census. This, therefore, it will be observed,
was strictly a civil tax.
of their own children,
or of strangers--This cannot mean
"foreigners," from whom sovereigns certainly do
not raise taxes, but those who are not of their own
family, that is, their subjects.
26. Peter saith unto him, Of strangers--"of
those not their children."
Jesus saith unto him,
Then are the children free--By "the
children" our Lord cannot here mean Himself and the
Twelve together, in some loose sense of their near
relationship to God as their common Father. For besides
that our Lord never once mixes Himself up with His
disciples in speaking of their relation to God, but ever
studiously keeps His relation and theirs apart (see, for
example, on the last words of this chapter)--this would be
to teach the right of believers to exemption from the dues
required for sacred services, in the teeth of all that
Paul teaches and that He Himself indicates throughout. He
can refer here, then, only to Himself; using the word
"children" evidently in order to express the
general principle observed by sovereigns, who do not draw
taxes from their own children, and thus convey the truth
respecting His own exemption the more strikingly:--namely,
"If the sovereign's own family be exempt, you know
the inference in My case"; or to express it more
nakedly than Jesus thought needful and fitting: "This
is a tax for upholding My Father's House. As His Son,
then, that tax is not due by Me--I AM FREE."
27. Notwithstanding, lest we should offend--stumble.
them--all ignorant
as they are of My relation to the Lord of the Temple, and
should misconstrue a claim to exemption into indifference
to His honor who dwells in it.
go thou to the sea--Capernaum,
it will be remembered, lay on the Sea of Galilee.
and cast an hook, and
take up the fish that first cometh up; and when thou hast
opened his mouth, thou shall find a piece of money--a
stater. So it should have been rendered, and not
indefinitely, as in our version, for the coin was an Attic
silver coin equal to two of the afore-mentioned "didrachms"
of half a shekel's value, and so, was the exact sum
required for both. Accordingly, the Lord adds,
that take, and give unto
them for me and thee--literally, "instead of Me
and thee"; perhaps because the payment was a redemption
of the person paid for (@Ex
30:12)--in which view Jesus certainly was
"free." If the house was Peter's, this will
account for payment being provided on this occasion, not
for all the Twelve, but only for him and His Lord.
Observe, our Lord does not say "for us," but
"for Me and thee"; thus distinguishing the
Exempted One and His non-exempted disciple.
|
|