| |
THE GOSPEL
ACCORDING TO
LUKE
Commentary by DAVID BROWN
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
CHAPTER 10
@Lu
10:1-24. MISSION OF THE SEVENTY DISCIPLES, AND THEIR
RETURN.
As our Lord's end approaches, the preparations for the
establishment of the coming Kingdom are quickened and
extended.
1. the Lord--a becoming title here, as this
appointment was an act truly lordly [BENGEL].
other seventy also--rather,
"others (also in number), seventy"; probably
with allusion to the seventy elders of Israel on whom the
Spirit descended in the wilderness (@Nu
11:24,25). The mission, unlike that of the Twelve, was
evidently quite temporary. All the instructions are
in keeping with a brief and hasty pioneering
mission, intended to supply what of general preparation
for coming events the Lord's own visit afterwards to the
same "cities and places" (@Lu
10:1) would not, from want of time, now suffice to
accomplish; whereas the instructions to the Twelve,
besides embracing all those to the Seventy, contemplate world-wide
and permanent effects. Accordingly, after their
return from this single missionary tour, we never again
read of the Seventy.
2. The harvest, &c.--(See on Mt 9:37).
pray ye therefore the
Lord of the harvest, that he would send forth labourers
into his harvest--(See on Mt 9:38).
3-12. (See on Mt 10:7-16).
10. son of peace--inwardly prepared to embrace your
message of peace. See note on "worthy," (see on
Mt 10:13).
12-15. (See on Mt 11:20-24).
for Sodom--Tyre and
Sidon were ruined by commercial prosperity; Sodom sank
through its vile pollutions: but the doom of otherwise
correct persons who, amidst a blaze of light, reject the
Saviour, shall be less endurable than that of any
of these.
16. He that, &c.--(See on Mt 10:40).
17. returned--evidently not long away.
Lord,
&c.--"Thou hast exceeded Thy promise, for 'even
the devils,'" &c. The possession of such
power, not being expressly in their commission, as in that
to the Twelve (@Lu
9:1), filled them with more astonishment and joy than
all else.
through thy name--taking
no credit to themselves, but feeling lifted into a region
of unimagined superiority to the powers of evil simply
through their connection with Christ.
18. I beheld--As much of the force of this glorious
statement depends on the nice shade of sense indicated by
the imperfect tense in the original, it should be
brought out in the translation: "I was beholding
Satan as lightning falling from heaven"; that is,
"I followed you on your mission, and watched its
triumphs; while you were wondering at the subjection to
you of devils in My name, a grander spectacle was
opening to My view; sudden as the darting of lightning
from heaven to earth, lo! Satan was beheld falling from
heaven!" How remarkable is this, that by that law of
association which connects a part with the whole, those
feeble triumphs of the Seventy seem to have not only
brought vividly before the Redeemer the whole ultimate
result of His mission, but compressed it into a moment and
quickened it into the rapidity of lightning! Note.--The
word rendered "devils," is always used
for those spiritual agents employed in demoniacal
possessions--never for the ordinary agency of Satan in
rational men. When therefore the Seventy say, "the devils
[demons] are subject to us," and Jesus replies,
"Mine eye was beholding Satan falling,"
it is plain that He meant to raise their minds not only
from the particular to the general, but from
a very temporary form of satanic operation to the
entire kingdom of evil. (See @Joh
12:31; and compare @Isa
14:12).
19. Behold, I give you, &c.--not for any
renewal of their mission, though probably many of them
afterwards became ministers of Christ; but simply as
disciples.
serpents and scorpions--the
latter more venomous than the former: literally, in the
first instance (@Mr
16:17,18 Ac 28:5); but the next words, "and
over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall by any
means hurt you," show that the glorious power of
faith to "overcome the world" and "quench
all the fiery darts of the wicked one," by the
communication and maintenance of which to His people He
makes them innocuous, is what is meant (@1Jo
5:4 Eph 6:16).
20. rejoice not, &c.--that is, not so much. So
far from forbidding it, He takes occasion from it to tell
them what had been passing in His own mind. But as power
over demons was after all intoxicating, He gives them a
higher joy to balance it, the joy of having their
names in Heaven's register (@Php
4:3).
21, 22. Jesus . . . said, &c.--The
very same sublime words were uttered by our Lord on a
former similar occasion (see on Mt 11:25-27); but (1)
There we are merely told that He "answered and
said" thus; here, He "rejoiced in spirit
and said," &c. (2) There it was merely "at
that time" (or season) that He spoke thus, meaning
with a general reference to the rejection of His gospel by
the self-sufficient; here, "In that hour Jesus
said," with express reference probably to the humble
class from which He had to draw the Seventy, and the
similar class that had chiefly welcomed their message.
"Rejoice" is too weak a word. It is
"exulted in spirit"--evidently giving visible
expression to His unusual emotions; while, at the same
time, the words "in spirit" are meant to convey
to the reader the depth of them. This is one of
those rare cases in which the veil is lifted from off the
Redeemer's inner man, that, angel-like, we may "look
into it" for a moment (@1Pe
1:12). Let us gaze on it with reverential wonder, and
as we perceive what it was that produced that mysterious
ecstasy, we shall find rising in our hearts a still
rapture--"Oh, the depths!"
23, 24. (See on Mt 13:16,17).
@Lu
10:25-37. QUESTION OF A LAWYER AND PARABLE OF THE GOOD
SAMARITAN.
25. tempted him--"tested him"; in no
hostile spirit, yet with no tender anxiety for light on
that question of questions, but just to see what insight
this great Galilean teacher had.
26. What is written in the law--apposite question
to a doctor of the law, and putting him in turn to
the test [BENGEL].
27. Thou shalt, &c.--the answer Christ Himself
gave to another lawyer. (See on Mr 12:29-33).
28. he said, &c.--"Right; THIS do, and
life is thine"--laying such emphasis on
"this" as to indicate, without expressing it, where
the real difficulty to a sinner lay, and thus
nonplussing the questioner himself.
29. willing--"wishing," to get himself
out of the difficulty, by throwing on Jesus the definition
of "neighbor," which the Jews interpreted very
narrowly and technically, as excluding Samaritans and
Gentiles [ALFORD].
30. A certain man--a Jew.
from Jerusalem to
Jericho--a distance of nineteen miles northeast, a
deep and very fertile hollow--"the Temple of
Judea" [TRENCH].
thieves--"robbers."
The road, being rocky and desolate, was a notorious haunt
of robbers, then and for ages after, and even to this day.
31, 32. came down a . . . priest . . .
and a Levite--Jericho, the second city of Judea, was a
city of the priests and Levites, and thousands of them
lived there. The two here mentioned are supposed,
apparently, to be returning from temple duties, but
they had not learnt what that meaneth, 'I will have mercy
and not sacrifice' [TRENCH].
saw him--It was not inadvertently
that he acted.
came and looked--a
further aggravation.
passed by--although
the law expressly required the opposite treatment even of
the beast not only of their brethren, but of
their enemy (@De
22:4 Ex 23:4,5; compare @Isa
58:7).
33. Samaritan--one excommunicated by the Jews, a
byword among them, synonymous with heretic and devil (@Joh
8:48; see on Lu 17:18).
had compassion--His
best is mentioned first; for "He who gives outward
things gives something external to himself, but he
who imparts compassion and tears gives him something from
his very self" [GREGORY THE GREAT, in TRENCH]. No
doubt the priest and Levite had their excuses--It is not
safe to be lingering here; besides, he's past recovery;
and then, may not suspicion rest upon ourselves? So might
the Samaritan have reasoned, but did not [TRENCH].
Nor did he say, He's a Jew, who would have had no dealings
with me (@Joh
4:9), and why should I with him?
34. oil and wine--the remedies used in such cases
all over the East (@Isa
1:6), and elsewhere; the wine to cleanse the
wounds, the oil to assuage their smartings.
on his own beast--himself
going on foot.
35. two pence--equal to two day's wages of a
laborer, and enough for several days' support.
36. Which . . . was neighbour?--a most
dexterous way of putting the question: (1) Turning the
question from, "Whom am I to love as my neighbour?"
to "Who is the man that shows that love?" (2)
Compelling the lawyer to give a reply very different from
what he would like--not only condemning his own nation,
but those of them who should be the most exemplary. (3)
Making him commend one of a deeply hated race. And he does
it, but it is almost extorted. For he does not answer,
"The Samaritan"--that would have sounded
heterodox, heretical--but "He that showed mercy on
him." It comes to the same thing, no doubt, but the
circumlocution is significant.
37. Go, &c.--O exquisite, matchless teaching!
What new fountains of charity has not this opened up in
the human spirit--rivers in the wilderness, streams in the
desert! What noble Christian institutions have not such
words founded, all undreamed of till that wondrous One
came to bless this heartless world of ours with His
incomparable love--first in words, and then in deeds which
have translated His words into flesh and blood, and poured
the life of them through that humanity which He made His
own! Was this parable, now, designed to magnify the law of
love, and to show who fulfils it and who not? And who did
this as never man did it, as our Brother Man, "our
Neighbor?" The priests and Levites had not
strengthened the diseased, nor bound up the broken (@Eze
34:4), while He bound up the brokenhearted (@Isa
61:1), and poured into all wounded spirits the balm of
sweetest consolation. All the Fathers saw through the thin
veil of this noblest of stories, the Story of love,
and never wearied of tracing the analogy (though sometimes
fancifully enough) [TRENCH]. Exclaims GREGORY NAZIANZEN
(in the fourth century), "He hungered, but He fed
thousands; He was weary, but He is the Rest of the weary;
He is saluted 'Samaritan' and 'Demoniac,' but He saves
him that went down from Jerusalem and fell among thieves,"
&c.
@Lu
10:38-42. MARTHA AND MARY.
38. certain village--Bethany (@Joh
11:1), which Luke so speaks of, having no farther
occasion to notice it.
received him . . .
her house--The house belonged to her, and she appears
throughout to be the older sister.
39. which also--"who for her part," in
contrast with Martha.
sat--"seated
herself." From the custom of sitting beneath
an instructor, the phrase "sitting at one's
feet" came to mean being a disciple of any one (@Ac
22:3).
heard--rather,
"kept listening" to His word.
40. cumbered--"distracted."
came to him--"presented
herself before Him," as from another apartment, in
which her sister had "left her to serve (or
make preparation) alone."
carest thou not . . .
my sister, &c.--"Lord, here am I with
everything to do, and this sister of mine will not lay a
hand to anything; thus I miss something from Thy lips, and
Thou from our hands."
bid her,
&c.--She presumes not to stop Christ's teaching by
calling her sister away, and thus leaving Him without His
one auditor, nor did she hope perhaps to succeed if she
had tried.
41. Martha, Martha--emphatically redoubling upon
the name.
careful and cumbered--the
one word expressing the inward worrying anxiety
that her preparations should be worthy of her Lord; the
other, the outward bustle of those preparations.
many things--"much
service" (@Lu
10:40); too elaborate preparation, which so engrossed
her attention that she missed her Lord's teaching.
42. one thing, &c.--The idea of "Short
work and little of it suffices for Me" is not so much
the lower sense of these weighty words, as supposed
in them, as the basis of something far loftier than any
precept on economy. Underneath that idea is couched
another, as to the littleness both of elaborate
preparation for the present life and of that life
itself, compared with another.
chosen the good part--not
in the general sense of Moses' choice (@Heb
11:25), and Joshua's (@Jos
24:15), and David's (@Ps
119:30); that is, of good in opposition to bad;
but, of two good ways of serving and pleasing the Lord,
choosing the better. Wherein, then, was Mary's
better than Martha's? Hear what follows.
not be taken away--Martha's
choice would be taken from her, for her services would
die with her; Mary's never, being spiritual and
eternal. Both were true-hearted disciples, but the one was
absorbed in the higher, the other in the lower of two ways
of honoring their common Lord. Yet neither despised, or
would willingly neglect, the other's occupation. The one
represents the contemplative, the other the active
style of the Christian character. A Church full of Marys
would perhaps be as great an evil as a Church full of
Marthas. Both are needed, each to be the complement of the
other.
|
|