| |
THE GOSPEL
ACCORDING TO
JOHN
Commentary by DAVID BROWN
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
CHAPTER 8
@Joh
8:1-11. THE WOMAN TAKEN IN ADULTERY.
1, 2. Jesus went unto the Mount of Olives--This
should have formed the last verse of the foregoing chapter.
"The return of the people to the inert quiet and
security of their dwellings (@Joh
7:53), at the close of the feast, is designedly
contrasted with our Lord's homeless way, so to speak,
of spending the short night, who is early in the morning on
the scene again. One cannot well see why what is recorded in
@Lu
21:37,38 may not even thus early have taken place; it
might have been the Lord's ordinary custom from the
beginning to leave the brilliant misery of the city every
night, that so He might compose His sorrowful and
interceding heart, and collect His energies for new labors
of love; preferring for His resting-place Bethany, and the Mount
of Olives, the scene thus consecrated by many
preparatory prayers for His final humiliation and
exaltation" [STIER].
3-6. scribes and Pharisees--foiled in their
yesterday's attempt, and hoping to succeed better in this.
4, 5. woman . . . in adultery . . .
Moses . . . commanded . . . should be
stoned--simply put to death (@De
22:22), but in aggravated cases, at least in later
times, this was probably by stoning (@Eze
16:40).
but what sayest thou--hoping,
whatever He might answer, to put Him in the wrong:--if He
said, Stone her, that would seem a stepping out of His
province; if He forbade it, that would hold Him up as a
relaxer of the public morals. But these cunning hypocrites
were overmatched.
6. stooped down--It will be observed He was sitting
when they came to Him.
with his finger wrote on
the ground--The words of our translators in italics
("as though He heard them not") have hardly
improved the sense, for it is scarcely probable He could
wish that to be thought. Rather He wished to show them His
aversion to enter on the subject. But as this did not suit
them, they "continue asking Him," pressing for an
answer. At last, raising Himself He said.
7. He that is without sin--not meaning sinless
altogether; nor yet, guiltless of a literal breach of the
Seventh Commandment; but probably, he whose conscience
acquits him of any such sin.
cast a stone--"the
stone," meaning the first one (@De
17:7).
8. again he stooped down and wrote--The design of
this second stooping and writing on the ground was evidently
to give her accusers an opportunity to slink away unobserved
by Him, and so avoid an exposure to His eye which
they could ill have stood. Accordingly it is added.
9. they . . . convicted . . . went
out one by one . . . Jesus was left alone--that
is, without one of her accusers remaining; for it is added.
the woman in the midst--that
is, of the remaining audience. While the trap failed to
catch Him for whom it was laid, it caught those who laid it.
Stunned by the unexpected home thrust, they immediately made
off--which makes the impudence of those impure hypocrites in
dragging such a case before the public eye the more
disgusting.
10. Woman, &c.--What inimitable tenderness and
grace! Conscious of her own guilt, and till now in the hands
of men who had talked of stoning her, wondering at the skill
with which her accusers had been dispersed, and the grace
of the few words addressed to herself, she would be disposed
to listen, with a reverence and teachableness before
unknown, to our Lord's admonition. "And Jesus said unto
her, Neither do I condemn thee, go and sin no more." He
pronounces no pardon upon the woman (such as, "Thy sins
are forgiven thee" [compare @Lu
5:28 7:48]--"Go in peace" [compare @Mr
5:34 Lu 7:50 8:48]), much less does He say that she had
done nothing condemnable; He simply leaves the matter where
it was. He meddles not with the magistrate's office, nor
acts the Judge in any sense (@Joh
12:47). But in saying, "Go and sin no more,"
which had been before said to one who undoubtedly believed
(@Joh
5:14), more is probably implied than expressed. If
brought suddenly to conviction of sin, admiration of her
Deliverer, and a willingness to be admonished and guided by
Him, this call to begin a new life may have carried with it
what would ensure and naturally bring about a permanent
change. (This whole narrative is wanting in some of the
earliest and most valuable manuscripts, and those which have
it vary to some extent. The internal evidence in its favor
is almost overpowering. It is easy to account for its omission,
though genuine; but if not so, it is next to impossible to
account for its insertion).
@Joh
8:12-59. FURTHER DISCOURSES OF JESUS--ATTEMPT TO STONE
HIM.
12. I am the light of the world--As the former
references to water (@Joh
4:13,14 7:37-39) and to bread (@Joh
6:35) were occasioned by outward occurrences, so this
one to light. In "the treasury" where it
was spoken (see on Joh 8:20) stood two colossal golden
lamp-stands, on which hung a multitude of lamps, lighted
after the evening sacrifice (probably every evening during
the feast of tabernacles), diffusing their brilliancy, it is
said, over all the city. Around these the people danced with
great rejoicing. Now, as amidst the festivities of the water
from Siloam Jesus cried, saying, "If any man thirst,
let him come unto me and drink," so now amidst the
blaze and the joyousness of this illumination, He proclaims,
"I AM THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD"--plainly in the most
absolute sense. For though He gives His disciples the
same title, they are only "light in the Lord"
(@Eph
5:8); and though He calls the Baptist "the burning
and shining light" (or "lamp" of his
day, @Joh
5:35), yet "he was not that Light, but was
sent to bear witness of that Light: that was THE TRUE LIGHT
which, coming into the world, lighteth every man"
(@Joh
1:8,9). Under this magnificent title Messiah was
promised of old (@Isa
42:6 Mal 4:2, &c.).
he that followeth me--as
one does a light going before him, and as the Israelites did
the pillar of bright cloud in the wilderness.
but shall have the light
of life--the light, as of a new world, a newly awakened
spiritual and eternal life.
13-19. bearest record of thyself; thy record is not true--How
does He meet this specious cavil? Not by disputing the
wholesome human maxim that "self-praise is no
praise," but by affirming that He was an exception
to the rule, or rather, that it had no application to
Him.
14. for I know whence I came, and whither I go,
&c.--(See on Joh 7:28).
15. Ye judge after the flesh--with no spiritual
apprehension.
I judge no man.
16. And yet if I judge, my judgment is true,
&c.--Ye not only form your carnal and warped
judgments of Me, but are bent on carrying them into effect;
I, though I form and utter My judgment of you, am not here
to carry this into execution--that is reserved to a future
day; yet the judgment I now pronounce and the witness I now
bear is not Mine only as ye suppose, but His also that sent
Me. (See on Joh 5:31,32). And these are the two witnesses to
any fact which your law requires.
20. These words spake Jesus in the treasury--a
division, so called, of the fore court of the temple, part
of the court of the women [JOSEPHUS, Antiquities,
19.6.2, &c.], which may confirm the genuineness of @Joh
8:2-11, as the place where the woman was brought.
no man laid hands on him,
&c.--(See on Joh 7:30). In the dialogue that follows,
the conflict waxes sharper on both sides, till rising to its
climax, they take up stones to stone him.
21-25. Then said Jesus again unto them, I go my way,
&c.--(See on Joh 7:33).
22. Then said the Jews, Will he kill himself?--seeing
something more in His words than before (@Joh
7:35), but their question more malignant and scornful.
23. Ye are from beneath; I am from above--contrasting
Himself, not as in @Joh
3:31, simply with earthborn messengers of God,
but with men sprung from and breathing an opposite
element from His, which rendered it impossible that He
and they should have any present fellowship, or dwell
eternally together. (Again see on Joh 7:33; also see on Joh
8:44).
24. if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your
sins--They knew well enough what He meant (@Mr
13:6, Greek; compare @Mt
24:5). But He would not, by speaking it out, give them
the materials for a charge for which they were watching. At
the same time, one is irresistibly reminded by such
language, so far transcending what is becoming in men,
of those ancient declarations of the God of Israel, "I
AM HE" (@De
32:39 Isa 43:10,13 46:4 48:12). See on Joh 6:20.
25. Who art thou?--hoping thus to extort an explicit
answer; but they are disappointed.
26, 27. I have many things to say and to judge of you;
but he that sent me is true, &c.--that is, I could,
and at the fitting time, will say and judge many things of
you (referring perhaps to the work of the Spirit which is
for judgment as well as salvation, @Joh
16:8), but what I do say is just the message My Father
hath given Me to deliver.
28-30. When ye have lifted up the Son of man--The
plainest intimation He had yet given in public of the
manner and the authors of His death.
then shall ye know that I
am he, &c.--that is, find out, or have
sufficient evidence, how true was all He said, though they
would be far from owning it.
29. the Father hath not left me alone; for I do always
those things that please him, &c.--that is, To you,
who gnash upon Me with your teeth, and frown down all open
appearance for Me, I seem to stand uncountenanced and alone;
but I have a sympathy and support transcending all human
applause; I came hither to do My Father's will, and in the
doing of it have not ceased to please Him; therefore is He
ever by Me with His approving smile, His cheering words, His
supporting arm.
30. As he spake these words, many believed on him--Instead
of wondering at this, the wonder would be if words of such
unearthly, surpassing grandeur could be uttered
without captivating some that heard them. And just as
"all that sat in the council" to try Stephen
"saw his face"--though expecting nothing
but death--"as it had been the face of an angel"
(@Ac
6:15), so may we suppose that, full of the sweet
supporting sense of His Father's presence, amidst the rage
and scorn of the rulers, a divine benignity beamed from His
countenance, irradiated the words that fell from Him, and
won over the candid "many" of His audience.
31-33. Then said Jesus to those Jews who believed, If ye
continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed,
&c.--The impression produced by the last words of our
Lord may have become visible by some decisive movement, and
here He takes advantage of it to press on them "continuance"
in the faith, since then only were they His real disciples
(compare @Joh
15:3-8), and then should they experimentally
"know the truth," and "by the truth be made (spiritually)
free."
33. They answered him, We be Abraham's seed, and were
never in bondage to any man, &c.--Who said this? Not
surely the very class just spoken of as won over by His
divine words, and exhorted to continue in them. Most
interpreters seem to think so; but it is hard to ascribe
such a petulant speech to the newly gained disciples, even
in the lowest sense, much less persons so gained as
they were. It came, probably, from persons mixed up with
them in the same part of the crowd, but of a very different
spirit. The pride of the Jewish nation, even now
after centuries of humiliation, is the most striking feature
of their character. "Talk of freedom to us? Pray
when or to whom were we ever in bondage?" This bluster
sounds almost ludicrous from such a nation. Had they
forgotten their long and bitter bondage in Egypt? their
dreary captivity in Babylon? their present bondage to the
Roman yoke, and their restless eagerness to throw it off?
But probably they saw that our Lord pointed to something
else--freedom, perhaps, from the leaders of sects or
parties--and were not willing to allow their subjection even
to these. Our Lord, therefore, though He knew what slaves
they were in this sense, drives the ploughshare somewhat
deeper than this, to a bondage they little dreamt of.
34, 35. Whosoever committeth sin--that is, liveth
in the commission of it--(Compare @1Jo
3:8 Mt 7:23).
is the servant of sin--that
is, the bond-servant, or slave of it; for the
question is not about free service, but who are in bondage.
(Compare @2Pe
2:19 Re 6:16). The great truth here expressed was not
unknown to heathen moralists; but it was applied only to
vice, for they were total strangers to what in revealed
religion is called sin. The thought of slaves
and freemen in the house suggests to our Lord a wider
idea.
35. And the servant abideth not in the house for ever,
but the Son abideth ever--that is, "And if your
connection with the family of God be that of BOND-SERVANTS,
ye have no natural tie to the house; your tie is
essentially uncertain and precarious. But the SON'S
relationship to the FATHER is a natural and essential
one; it is an indefeasible tie; His abode in it is perpetual
and of right: That is My relationship, My tie: If,
then, ye would have your connection with God's family made real,
rightful, permanent, ye must by the Son be manumitted
and adopted as sons and daughters of the Lord
Almighty." In this sublime statement there is no doubt
a subordinate allusion to @Ge
21:10, "Cast out this bondwoman and her
son, for the son of this bond-woman shall not be heir
with my son, with Isaac." (Compare @Ga
4:22-30).
37-41. ye seek to kill me--He had said this to their
face before: He now repeats it, and they do not deny it; yet
are they held back, as by some marvellous spell--it was the
awe which His combined dignity, courage, and benignity
struck into them.
because my word hath no
place in you--When did ever human prophet so
speak of His words? They tell us of "the word of the
Lord" coming to them. But here is One who holds up
"His word" as that which ought to find entrance
and abiding room for itself in the souls of all who hear it.
38. my Father . . . your father--(See on
Joh 8:23).
39. If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works
of Abraham--He had just said He "knew they were
Abraham's children," that is, according to the flesh;
but the children of his faith and holiness they were
not, but the reverse.
40. this did not Abraham--In so doing ye act in
direct opposition to him.
41. We be not born of fornication . . . we have
one Father, God--meaning, as is generally allowed, that
they were not an illegitimate race in point of religion,
pretending only to be God's people, but were descended from
His own chosen Abraham.
42, 43. If God were your Father, ye would love me--"If
ye had anything of His moral image, as children have their
father's likeness, ye would love Me, for I am immediately of
Him and directly from Him." But "My speech"
(meaning His peculiar style of expressing Himself on these
subjects) is unintelligible to you because ye cannot take in
the truth which it conveys.
44. Ye are of your father the devil--"This is
one of the most decisive testimonies to the objective
(outward) personality of the devil. It is quite
impossible to suppose an accommodation to Jewish views, or a
metaphorical form of speech, in so solemn an assertion as
this" [ALFORD].
the lusts of your father--his
impure, malignant, ungodly propensities, inclinations,
desires.
ye will do--are
willing to do; not of any blind necessity of nature,
but of pure natural inclination.
He was a murderer from the
beginning--The reference is not to Cain (as
LOCKE, DE WETTE, ALFORD, &c.), but to Adam [GROTIUS,
CALVIN, MEYER, LUTHARDT, &c.]. The death of the human
race, in its widest sense, is ascribed to the murderous
seducer of our race.
and abode not in the truth--As,
strictly speaking, the word means "abideth," it
has been denied that the fall of Satan from a former
holy state is here expressed [LOCKE, &c.], and some
superior interpreters think it only implied [OLSHAUSEN,
&c.]. But though the form of the thought is
present--not past--this is to express the important idea,
that his whole character and activity are just a
continual aberration from his own original truth or
rectitude; and thus his fall is not only the implied
basis of the thought, but part of the statement
itself, properly interpreted and brought out.
no truth in him--void
of all that holy, transparent rectitude which, as His
creature, he originally possessed.
When he speaketh a lie, he
speaketh of his own--perhaps his own resources,
treasures (@Mt
12:35) [ALFORD]. (The word is plural). It means
that he has no temptation to it from without; it is
purely self-begotten, springing from a nature which
is nothing but obliquity.
the father of it--that
is, of lying: all the falsehood in the world owes its
existence to him. What a verse is this! It holds up the
devil (1) as the murderer of the human race; but as this is
meant here in the more profound sense of spiritual
death, it holds him up, (2) as the spiritual parent of this
fallen human family, communicating to his offspring his own
evil passions and universal obliquity, and stimulating these
into active exercise. But as there is "a stronger than
he," who comes upon him and overcomes him (@Lu
11:21,22), it is only such as "love the
darkness," who are addressed as children of the devil
(@Mt
13:38 1Jo 3:8-10).
45-47. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me
not--not although, but just because He did
so, for the reason given in the former verse. Had He been less
true they would have hailed Him more readily.
46. Which of you convinceth me of sin--"Convicteth,"
bringeth home a charge of sin. Glorious dilemma!
"Convict Me of sin, and reject Me: If not, why stand ye
out against My claims?" Of course, they could only be
supposed to impeach His life; but in One who had
already passed through unparalleled complications, and had
continually to deal with friends and foes of every sort and
degree, such a challenge thrown wide among His bitterest
enemies, can amount to nothing short of a claim to absolute
sinlessness.
48-51. Say we not well that thou art a Samaritan, and
hast a devil?--What intense and virulent scorn! (See @Heb
12:3). The "say we not well" refers to @Joh
7:20. "A Samaritan" means more than "no
Israelite at all"; it means one who pretended, but
had no manner of claim to the title--retorting perhaps,
this denial of their true descent from Abraham.
49. Jesus answered, I have not a devil--What calm
dignity is here! Verily, "when reviled, He reviled not
again" (@1Pe
2:23). Compare Paul (@Ac
26:25), "I am not mad," &c. He adds not,
"Nor am I a Samaritan," that He might not even
seem to partake of their contempt for a race that had
already welcomed Him as the Christ, and began to be blessed
by Him.
I honour my Father, and ye
do dishonour me--the language of wounded feeling.
But the interior of His soul at such moments is only
to be seen in such prophetic utterances as these, "For
thy sake I have borne reproach; shame hath covered my face;
I am become a stranger unto my brethren, an alien
unto my mother's children. For the zeal of thine house hath
eaten me up, and the reproaches of them that
reproached thee are fallen upon me" (@Ps
69:7-9).
50. I seek not mine own glory: there is one that seeketh--that
is, evidently, "that seeketh My glory"; requiring
"all men to honor the Son even as they honor the
Father"; judicially treating him "who
honoreth not the Son as honoring not the Father that hath
sent Him" (@Joh
5:23; and compare @Mt
17:5); but giving to Him (@Joh
6:37) such as will yet cast their crowns before His
throne, in whom He "shall see of the travail of his
soul, and be satisfied" (@Isa
53:11).
51. If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death--Partly
thus vindicating His lofty claims as Lord of the kingdom of
life everlasting, and, at the same time, holding out even to
His revilers the scepter of grace. The word "keep"
is in harmony with @Joh
8:31, "If ye continue in My word,"
expressing the permanency, as a living and paramount
principle, of that faith to which He referred: "never
see death," though virtually uttered before (@Joh
5:24 6:40,47,51), is the strongest and most naked
statement of a very glorious truth yet given. (In @Joh
11:26 it is repeated in nearly identical terms).
52, 53. Then said the Jews unto him, Now we know that
thou hast a devil, &c.--"Thou art now
self-convicted; only a demoniac could speak so; the most
illustrious of our fathers are dead, and Thou promisest
exemption from death to anyone who will keep Thy saying!
pray, who art Thou?"
54-56. If I honour myself, my honour is nothing,
&c.--(See on Joh 5:31, &c.).
55. I shall be a liar like unto you--now rising to
the summit of holy, naked severity, thereby to draw this
long dialogue to a head.
56. Abraham rejoiced to see my day, &c.--exulted,
or exceedingly rejoiced that he should see, he exulted to
see it, that is, by anticipation. Nay,
he saw it, and was
glad--he actually beheld it, to his joy. If this
mean no more than that he had a prophetic foresight of the
gospel-day--the second clause just repeating the first--how
could the Jews understand our Lord to mean that He "had
seen Abraham?" And if it mean that Abraham was then
beholding, in his disembodied spirit, the incarnate
Messiah [STIER, ALFORD, &c.], the words seem very
unsuitable to express it. It expresses something past--"he
saw My day, and was glad," that is,
surely while he lived. He seems to refer to the
familiar intercourse which Abraham had with God, who
is once and again in the history called "the Angel
of the Lord," and whom Christ here identifies with
Himself. On those occasions, Abraham "saw ME" (OLSHAUSEN,
though he thinks the reference is to some unrecorded scene).
If this be the meaning, all that follows is quite natural.
57-59. Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet
fifty years old--"No inference can be drawn from
this as to the age of our Lord at the time as man. Fifty
years was with the Jews the completion of manhood"
[ALFORD].
and hast thou seen
Abraham?--He had said Abraham saw Him, as being
his peculiar privilege. They give the opposite turn to
it--"Hast Thou seen Abraham?" as an honor
too great for Him to pretend to.
58. Before Abraham was, I am--The words rendered
"was" and "am" are quite different. The
one clause means, "Abraham was brought into being";
the other, "I exist." The statement
therefore is not that Christ came into existence before
Abraham did (as Arians affirm is the meaning), but that
He never came into being at all, but existed
before Abraham had a being; in other words, existed before creation,
or eternally (as @Joh
1:1). In that sense the Jews plainly understood Him,
since "then took they up stones to cast at Him," just
as they had before done when they saw that He made Himself
equal with God (@Joh
5:18).
hid himself--(See on
Lu 4:30).
|
|