| |
THE GOSPEL
ACCORDING TO
JOHN
Commentary by DAVID BROWN
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
CHAPTER 14
@Joh
14:1-31. DISCOURSE AT THE TABLE, AFTER SUPPER.
We now come to that portion of the evangelical history which
we may with propriety call its Holy of Holies. Our
Evangelist, like a consecrated priest, alone opens up to us
the view into this sanctuary. It is the record of the last
moments spent by the Lord in the midst of His disciples
before His passion, when words full of heavenly thought
flowed from His sacred lips. All that His heart, glowing
with love, had still to say to His friends, was compressed
into this short season. At first (from @Joh
13:31) the intercourse took the form of conversation;
sitting at table, they talked familiarly together. But when
(@Joh
14:31) the repast was finished, the language of Christ
assumed a loftier strain; the disciples, assembled around
their Master, listened to the words of life, and seldom
spoke a word (only @Joh
16:17,29). "At length, in the Redeemer's sublime
intercessory prayer, His full soul was poured forth in
express petitions to His heavenly Father on behalf of those
who were His own. It is a peculiarity of these last
chapters, that they treat almost exclusively of the most
profound relations--as that of the Son to the Father, and of
both to the Spirit, that of Christ to the Church, of the
Church to the world, and so forth. Moreover, a considerable
portion of these sublime communications surpassed the point
of view to which the disciples had at that time attained;
hence the Redeemer frequently repeats the same sentiments in
order to impress them more deeply upon their minds, and,
because of what they still did not understand, points them
to the Holy Spirit, who would remind them of all His
sayings, and lead them into all truth (@Joh
14:26)" [OLSHAUSEN].
1. Let not your heart be troubled, &c.--What
myriads of souls have not these opening words cheered, in
deepest gloom, since first they were uttered!
ye believe in God--absolutely.
believe also in me--that
is, Have the same trust in Me. What less, and what
else, can these words mean? And if so, what a demand to make
by one sitting familiarly with them at the supper table!
Compare the saying in @Joh
5:17, for which the Jews took up stones to stone Him, as
"making himself equal with God" (@Joh
14:18). But it is no transfer of our trust from its
proper Object; it is but the concentration of our
trust in the Unseen and Impalpable One upon His Own
Incarnate Son, by which that trust, instead of the
distant, unsteady, and too often cold and scarce real thing
it otherwise is, acquires a conscious reality, warmth, and
power, which makes all things new. This is Christianity
in brief.
2. In my Father's house are many mansions--and so
room for all, and a place for each.
if not, I would have told
you--that is, I would tell you so at once; I would not
deceive you.
I go to prepare a place
for you--to obtain for you a right to be there, and to
possess your "place."
3. I will come again and receive you unto myself--strictly,
at His Personal appearing; but in a secondary and comforting
sense, to each individually. Mark again the claim made:--to
come again to receive His people to Himself, that
where He is there they may be also. He thinks it
ought to be enough to be assured that they shall be where He
is and in His keeping.
4-7. whither I go ye know . . . Thomas saith,
Lord, we know not whither thou guest . . . Jesus
saith, I am the way, &c.--By saying this, He meant
rather to draw out their inquiries and reply to them. Christ
is "THE WAY" to the Father--"no man cometh
unto the Father but by Me"; He is "THE TRUTH"
of all we find in the Father when we get to Him, "For
in Him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily"
(@Col
2:9), and He is all "THE LIFE" that shall ever
flow to us and bless us from the Godhead thus approached and
thus manifested in Him--"this is the true God and
eternal life" (@1Jo
5:20).
7. from henceforth--now, or from this time,
understand.
8-12. The substance of this passage is that the Son
is the ordained and perfect manifestation of the Father,
that His own word for this ought to His disciples to be
enough; that if any doubts remained His works ought to
remove them (see on Joh 10:37); but yet that these works of
His were designed merely to aid weak faith, and would be
repeated, nay exceeded, by His disciples, in virtue of the
power He would confer on them after His departure. His
miracles the apostles wrought, though wholly in His name and
by His power, and the "greater" works--not in
degree but in kind--were the conversion of thousands in a
day, by His Spirit accompanying them.
13, 14. whatsoever ye . . . ask in my name--as
Mediator.
that will I do--as
Head and Lord of the kingdom of God. This comprehensive
promise is emphatically repeated in @Joh
14:14.
15-17. If ye love me, keep my commandments. And I will
pray the Father, &c.--This connection seems designed
to teach that the proper temple for the indwelling Spirit of
Jesus is a heart filled with that love to Him which lives
actively for Him, and so this was the fitting preparation
for the promised gift.
he shall give you another
Comforter--a word used only by John; in his Gospel
with reference to the Holy Spirit, in his First Epistle
(@1Jo
2:1), with reference to Christ Himself. Its proper sense
is an "advocate," "patron,"
"helper." In this sense it is plainly meant of
Christ (@1Jo
2:1), and in this sense it comprehends all the comfort
as well as aid of the Spirit's work. The Spirit is
here promised as One who would supply Christ's own place
in His absence.
that he may abide with you
for ever--never go away, as Jesus was going to do in the
body.
17. whom the world cannot receive, &c.--(See @1Co
2:14).
he dwelleth with you, and
shall be in you--Though the proper fulness of both these
was yet future, our Lord, by using both the present and the
future, seems plainly to say that they already had
the germ of this great blessing.
18-20. I will not leave you comfortless--in a
bereaved and desolate condition; or (as in Margin)
"orphans."
I will come to you--"I
come" or "am coming" to you; that is, plainly
by the Spirit, since it was to make His departure to
be no bereavement.
19. world seeth--beholdeth.
me no more, but ye see--behold.
me--His bodily
presence, being all the sight of Him which "the
world" ever had, or was capable of, it "beheld Him
no more" after His departure to the Father; but by the
coming of the Spirit, the presence of Christ was not only continued
to His spiritually enlightened disciples, but rendered far
more efficacious and blissful than His bodily presence
had been before the Spirit's coming.
because I live--not
"shall live," only when raised from the
dead; for it is His unextinguishable, divine life of which
He speaks, in view of which His death and resurrection
were but as shadows passing over the sun's glorious disk.
(Compare @Lu
24:5 Re 1:18, "the Living One"). And this
grand saying Jesus uttered with death immediately in
view. What a brightness does this throw over the next
clause, "ye shall live also!" "Knowest thou
not," said LUTHER to the King of Terrors, "that
thou didst devour the Lord Christ, but wert obliged to give
Him back, and wert devoured of Him? So thou must leave me
undevoured because I abide in Him, and live and suffer for
His name's sake. Men may hunt me out of the world--that I
care not for--but I shall not on that account abide in
death. I shall live with my Lord Christ, since I know and
believe that He liveth!" (quoted in STIER).
20. At that day--of the Spirit's coming.
ye shall know that I am in
my Father, ye in me, I in you--(See on Joh 17:22,23).
21. He that hath my commandments and keepeth them,
&c.--(See on Joh
14:15).
my Father and I will love
him--Mark the sharp line of distinction here, not only
between the Divine Persons but the actings of love in Each
respectively, towards true disciples.
22. Judas saith . . . not Iscariot--Beautiful
parenthesis this! The traitor being no longer present, we
needed not to be told that this question came not from him.
But it is as if the Evangelist had said, "A very
different Judas from the traitor, and a very different
question from any that he would have put. Indeed [as one in
STIER says], we never read of Iscariot that he entered in
any way into his Master's words, or ever put a question even
of rash curiosity (though it may be he did, but that nothing
from him was deemed fit for immortality in the
Gospels but his name and treason)."
how . . .
manifest thyself to us, and not to the world--a most
natural and proper question, founded on @Joh
14:19, though interpreters speak against it as Jewish.
23. we will come and make our abode with him--Astonishing
statement! In the Father's "coming" He
"refers to the revelation of Him as a Father to
the soul, which does not take place till the Spirit comes
into the heart, teaching it to cry, Abba,
Father" [OLSHAUSEN]. The "abode" means a
permanent, eternal stay! (Compare @Le
26:11,12 Eze 37:26,27 2Co 6:16; and contrast @Jer
14:8).
25, 26. he shall teach you all things, and bring all to . . .
remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you--(See on
Joh 14:15; Joh 14:17). As the Son came in the Father's
name, so the Father shall send the Spirit in My name,
says Jesus, that is, with like divine power and authority
to reproduce in their souls what Christ taught them,
"bringing to living consciousness what lay like
slumbering germs in their minds" [OLSHAUSEN]. On
this rests the credibility and ultimate divine authority of
THE GOSPEL HISTORY. The whole of what is here said of THE
SPIRIT is decisive of His divine personality.
"He who can regard all the personal expressions,
applied to the Spirit in these three chapters ('teaching,'
'reminding,' 'testifying,' 'coming,' 'convincing,'
'guiding,' 'speaking,' 'hearing,' 'prophesying,' 'taking')
as being no other than a long drawn-out figure, deserves not
to be recognized even as an interpreter of intelligible
words, much less an expositor of Holy Scripture" [STIER].
27. Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you--If
@Joh
14:25,26 sounded like a note of preparation for drawing
the discourse to a close, this would sound like a farewell.
But oh, how different from ordinary adieus! It is a
parting word, but of richest import, the customary
"peace" of a parting friend sublimed and
transfigured. As "the Prince of Peace" (@Isa
9:6) He brought it into flesh, carried it about in His
Own Person ("My peace") died to make it ours, left
it as the heritage of His disciples upon earth, implants and
maintains it by His Spirit in their hearts. Many a legacy is
"left" that is never "given" to the
legatee, many a gift destined that never reaches its proper
object. But Christ is the Executor of His own Testament; the
peace He "leaves" He "gives";
Thus all is secure.
not as the world giveth--in
contrast with the world, He gives sincerely,
substantially, eternally.
28. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I
go unto the Father, for my Father is greater than I--These
words, which Arians and Socinians perpetually quote as
triumphant evidence against the proper Divinity of Christ,
really yield no intelligible sense on their principles. Were
a holy man on his deathbed, beholding his friends in
tears at the prospect of losing him, to say, "Ye ought
rather to joy than weep for me, and would if ye really loved
me, "the speech would be quite natural. But if they
should ask him, why joy at his departure was more
suitable than sorrow, would they not start back with
astonishment, if not horror, were he to reply, "Because
my Father is greater than I?" Does not this strange
speech from Christ's lips, then, presuppose such teaching
on His part as would make it extremely difficult for them to
think He could gain anything by departing to the Father, and
make it necessary for Him to say expressly that there was a
sense in which He could do so? Thus, this startling
explanation seems plainly intended to correct such
misapprehensions as might arise from the emphatic and
reiterated teaching of His proper equality with the
Father--as if so Exalted a Person were incapable of any
accession by transition from this dismal scene to a
cloudless heaven and the very bosom of the Father--and by
assuring them that this was not the case, to make
them forget their own sorrow in His approaching joy.
30, 31. Hereafter I will not talk much with you--"I
have a little more to say, but My work hastens apace, and
the approach of the adversary will cut it short."
for the prince of this
world--(See on Joh 12:31).
cometh--with hostile
intent, for a last grand attack, having failed in His first
formidable assault (@Lu
4:1-13) from which he "departed [only] for a
season" (@Joh
14:13).
and hath nothing in me--nothing
of His own--nothing to fasten on. Glorious saying! The truth
of it is, that which makes the Person and Work of Christ the
life of the world (@Heb
9:14 1Jo 3:5 2Co 5:21).
31. But that the world may know that I love the Father,
&c.--The sense must be completed thus: "But to the
Prince of the world, though he has nothing in Me, I shall
yield Myself up even unto death, that the world may know
that I love and obey the Father, whose commandment it is
that I give My life a ransom for many."
Arise, let us go hence--Did
they then, at this stage of the discourse, leave the supper
room, as some able interpreters conclude? If so, we think
our Evangelist would have mentioned it: see @Joh
18:1, which seems clearly to intimate that they then
only left the upper room. But what do the words mean if not
this? We think it was the dictate of that saying of earlier
date, "I have a baptism to be baptized with, and how
am I straitened till it be accomplished!"--a
spontaneous and irrepressible expression of the deep
eagerness of His spirit to get into the conflict, and that
if, as is likely, it was responded to somewhat too literally
by the guests who hung on His lips, in the way of a movement
to depart, a wave of His hand, would be enough to show that
He had yet more to say ere they broke up; and that disciple,
whose pen was dipped in a love to his Master which made their
movements of small consequence save when essential to the
illustration of His words, would record this little
outburst of the Lamb hastening to the slaughter, in the very
midst of His lofty discourse; while the effect of it, if
any, upon His hearers, as of no consequence, would naturally
enough be passed over.
|
|