| |
THE SECOND AND THIRD EPISTLES
GENERAL OF
JOHN
Commentary by A. R. FAUSSETT
INTRODUCTION
AUTHENTICITY.--That
these two Epistles were written by the same author appears
from their similarity of tone, style, and sentiments. That
John, the beloved disciple, was the author of the Second
and Third Epistles, as of the First Epistle, appears from
IRENĈUS [Against
Heresies, 1.16.3], who quotes @2Jo
1:10,11; and in [3.16.8], he quotes @2Jo
1:7, mistaking it, however, as if occurring in First
John. CLEMENT OF
ALEXANDRIA (A.D.
192) [Miscellanies, 2.66], implies his knowledge of
other Epistles of John besides the First Epistle; and in
fragments of his Adumbrations [p. 1011], he says,
"John's Second Epistle which was written to the virgins (Greek,
"parthenous"; perhaps Parthos is what was
meant) is the simplest; but it was written to a certain
Babylonian named the Elect lady." DIONYSIUS
OF ALEXANDRIA
(in EUSEBIUS
[Ecclesiastical History, 7.25]) observes that John
never names himself in his Epistles, "not even in the
Second and Third Epistles, although they are short
Epistles, but simply calls himself the presbyter, a
confutation of those who think John the apostle
distinct from John the presbyter. ALEXANDER
OF ALEXANDRIA
cites @2Jo
1:10:11, as John's [SOCRATES,
Ecclesiastical History, 1.6]. CYPRIAN
[Concerning the Baptism of Heretics], in referring
to the bishops at the Council of Carthage, says, "John the
apostle, in His Epistle, has said, if any come to you" (@2Jo
1:10); so that this Epistle, and therefore its twin
sister, Third John, was recognized as apostolic in the
North African Church. The MURATORI
fragment is ambiguous. The Second and Third Epistles were
not in the Peschito or old Syriac version;
and COSMAS INDICOPLEUSTES
in the sixth century says that in his time the Syriac
Church only acknowledged three of the Catholic Epistles,
First Peter, First John, and James. But EPHREM
THE SYRIAN
quotes the Second Epistle of John. EUSEBIUS
[Ecclesiastical History,] reckons both Epistles
among the Antilegomena or controverted
Scriptures, as distinguished from the Homologoumena
or universally acknowledged from the first. Still
his own opinion was that the two minor Epistles were
genuine, remarking, as he does in Demonstration of the
Gospel [3.5], that in John's "Epistles" he does
not mention his own name, nor call himself an apostle or
evangelist, but an "elder" (@2Jo
1:1 3Jo 1:1). ORIGEN
(in EUSEBIUS
[Ecclesiastical History, 6.25]) mentions the Second
and Third Epistles, but adds, "not all admit
(implying that most authorities do) their
genuineness." JEROME
[On Illustrious Men, 9] mentions the two latter
Epistles as attributed to John the presbyter, whose
sepulcher was shown among the Ephesians in his day. But
the designation "elder" was used of the apostles by others
(for example, PAPIAS,
in EUSEBIUS [Ecclesiastical
History, 3.39]), and is used by Peter, an apostle, of
himself (@1Pe
5:1). Why, then, should not John also use this
designation of himself, in consonance with the humility
which leads him not to name himself or his apostleship
even in the First Epistle? The Antilegomena were
generally recognized as canonical soon after the Council
of Nicea (A.D.
325). Thus CYRIL OF
JERUSALEM,
A.D. 349,
enumerates fourteen Epistles of Paul, and seven Catholic
Epistles. So GREGORY
NAZIANZEN, in
A.D. 389. The
Councils of Hippo, 393, and Carthage, 397, adopted a
catalogue of New Testament books exactly agreeing with our
canon. So our oldest extant Greek manuscripts. The
Second and Third Epistles of John, from their brevity
(which ORIGEN
notices), and the private nature of their contents, were
less generally read in the earliest Christian assemblies
and were also less quoted by the Fathers; hence arose
their non-universal recognition at the first. Their
private nature makes them the less likely to be spurious,
for there seems no purpose in their forgery. The style and
coloring too accord with the style of the First Epistle.
TO WHOM
ADDRESSED.--The Third Epistle is
directed to Gaius or Caius; whether Gaius of Macedonia (@Ac
19:20), or Gaius of Corinth (@Ro
16:23 1Co 1:14), or Gaius of Derbe (@Ac
20:4), it is hard to decide. MILL
believes Gaius, bishop of Pergamos [Apostolic
Constitutions, 7.40], to be the person addressed in @3Jo
1:1.
The address of the Second Epistle
is more disputed. It opens, "The elder unto the Elect
lady" (@2Jo
1:1). And it closes, "The children of thy elect
sister greet thee" (@2Jo
1:13). Now, @1Pe
1:1,2, addresses the elect in Asia, &c., and
closes (@1Pe
5:13), "The Church that is at Babylon, elected
together with you, saluteth you." Putting together these
facts, with the quotations (above) from CLEMENT
OF ALEXANDRIA,
and the fact that the word "Church" comes from a Greek
word (kyriake) cognate to the Greek for
"lady" (kyria; "belonging to the Lord,"
kyrios); WORDSWORTH'S
view is probable. As Peter in Babylon had sent the
salutations of the elect Church in the then
Parthian (see above on CLEMENT
OF ALEXANDRIA)
Babylon to her elect sister in Asia, so
John, the metropolitan president of the elect Church in
Asia, writes to the elect lady, that is, Church, in
Babylon. NEANDER,
ALFORD, and
others, think the Greek "kyria" not to mean
"lady," but to be her proper name; and that she had
a "sister, a Christian matron," then with John.
DATE AND
PLACE OF WRITING.--EUSEBIUS
[Ecclesiastical History, 3.25] relates that John,
after the death of Domitian, returned from his exile in
Patmos to Ephesus, and went on missionary tours into the
heathen regions around, and also made visitations of the
churches around, and ordained bishops and clergy. Such
journeys are mentioned, @2Jo
1:12 3Jo 1:10,14. If EUSEBIUS
be right, both Epistles must have been written after the
Apocalypse, in his old age, which harmonizes with the tone
of the Epistles, and in or near Ephesus. It was on one of
his visitation tours that he designed to rebuke Diotrephes
(@3Jo
1:9,10).
@2Jo
1:1-13. ADDRESS:
GREETING: THANKSGIVING
FOR THE ELECT
LADY'S FAITHFULNESS
IN THE TRUTH:
ENJOINS LOVE:
WARNS AGAINST
DECEIVERS, LEST
WE LOSE
OUR REWARD:
CONCLUSION.
1. The elder--In a familiar
letter John gives himself a less authoritative designation
than "apostle"; so @1Pe
5:1.
lady--BENGEL
takes the Greek as a proper name Kyria,
answering to the Hebrew "Martha." Being a person of
influence, "deceivers" (@2Jo
1:7) were insinuating themselves into her family to
seduce her and her children from the faith [TIRINUS],
whence John felt it necessary to write a warning to her.
(But see my Introduction and @1Pe
5:13). A particular Church, probably that at
Babylon, was intended. "Church" is derived from Greek
"Kuriake," akin to Kuria, or Kyria
here; the latter word among the Romans and Athenians means
the same as ecclesia, the term appropriated to
designate the Church assembly.
love in the truth--Christian love
rests on the Christian truth (@2Jo
1:3, end). Not merely "I love in truth," but "I
love in THE
truth."
all--All Christians form one fellowship,
rejoicing in the spiritual prosperity of one another. "The
communion of love is as wide as the communion of faith" [ALFORD].
2. For the truth's sake--joined
with "I love," @2Jo
1:1. "They who love in the truth, also love
on account of the truth."
dwelleth in us, and shall be with us for ever--in
consonance with Christ's promise.
3. Grace be with you--One
of the oldest manuscripts and several versions have "us"
for you. The Greek is literally, "Grace
shall be with us," that is, with both you and me.
A prayer, however, is implied besides a confident
affirmation.
grace . . . mercy . . . peace--"Grace"
covers the sins of men; "mercy," their miseries. Grace
must first do away with man's guilt before his misery can
be relieved by mercy. Therefore grace stands
before mercy. Peace is the result of both, and
therefore stands third in order. Casting all our care on
the Lord, with thanksgiving, maintains this peace.
the Lord--The oldest manuscripts and most of
the oldest versions omit "the Lord." John never elsewhere
uses this title in his Epistles, but "the Son of God."
in truth and love--The element or sphere in
which alone grace, mercy, and peace, have
place. He mentions truth in @2Jo
1:4; love, in @2Jo
1:5. Paul uses FAITH
and love; for faith and truth are
close akin.
4. I found--probably in one
of his missionary tours of superintendence. See
Introduction, at the end, and @2Jo
1:12 3Jo 1:10,14.
of thy children--some.
in truth--that is, in the Gospel
truth.
as--even as. "The Father's commandment" is
the standard of "the truth."
5. I beseech--rather
(compare Note, see on 1Jo 5:16), "I request thee,"
implying some degree of authority.
not . . . new commandment--It was old
in that Christians heard it from the first in the Gospel
preaching; new, in that the Gospel rested love on
the new principle of filial imitation of God who first
loved us, and gave Jesus to die for us; and also,
in that love is now set forth with greater
clearness than in the Old Testament dispensation. Love
performs both tables of the law, and is the end of the law
and the Gospel alike (compare Notes, see on 1Jo
2:7,8).
that we--implying that he already had love,
and urging her to join him in the same Christian grace.
This verse seems to me to decide that a Church, not
an individual lady, is meant. For a man to urge a
woman ("THEE";
not thee and thy children) that he and she should
love one another, is hardly like an apostolic
precept, however pure may be the love enjoined; but all is
clear if "the lady" represent a
Church.
6. "Love is the fulfilling
of the law" (@Ro
13:10), and the fulfilling of the law is the sure test
of love.
This is the commandment--Greek, "The
commandment is this," namely, love, in which all
God's other commandments are summed up.
7. As love and
truth go hand in hand (@2Jo
1:3,4), he feels it needful to give warning against
teachers of untruth.
For--giving the reason why he dwelt on
truth and on love, which manifests itself in
keeping God's commandments (@2Jo
1:6).
many--(@1Jo
2:18 4:1).
are entered--The oldest manuscripts read,
"have gone forth," namely, from us.
confess not . . . Jesus . . . in the flesh--the
token of Antichrist.
is come--Greek, "coming." He who
denies Christ's coming in the flesh, denies the
possibility of the incarnation; he who denies that he
has come, denies its actuality. They denied
the possibility of a Messiah's appearing, or coming,
in the flesh [NEANDER].
I think the Greek present participle implies
both the first and the second advent of Christ. He is
often elsewhere called the Coming One (Greek),
@Mt
11:3 Heb 10:37. The denial of the reality of His
manifestation in the flesh, at His first coming, and of
His personal advent again, constitutes Antichrist. "The
world turns away from God and Christ, busily intent
upon its own husks; but to OPPOSE
God and Christ is of the leaven of Satan" [BENGEL].
This is a, &c.--Greek, "This (such a
one as has been just described) is the deceiver and
the Antichrist." The many who in a degree
fulfil the character, are forerunners of the final
personal Antichrist, who shall concentrate in himself all
the features of previous Antichristian systems.
8. Look to yourselves--amidst
the widespread prevalence of deception so many being led
astray. So Christ's warning, @Mt
24:4,5,24.
we lose not . . . we receive--The oldest
manuscripts and versions read, "That
YE lose not, but
that YE
receive."
which we have wrought--So one oldest
manuscript reads. Other very old manuscripts, versions,
and Fathers, read, "which YE
have wrought." The we being seemingly the more
difficult reading is less likely to have been a
transcriber's alteration. Look that ye lose not the
believing state of "truth and love," which
WE (as God's
workmen, @2Co
6:1 2Ti 2:15) were the instruments of working in you.
a full reward--of grace not of debt. Fully
consummated glory. If "which YE
have wrought" be read with very old authorities, the
reward meant is that of their "work (of faith) and labor
of love." There are degrees of heavenly reward
proportioned to the degrees of capability of receiving
heavenly blessedness. Each vessel of glory hanging on
Jesus shall be fully happy. But the larger the vessel, the
greater will be its capacity for receiving heavenly bliss.
He who with one pound made ten, received authority over
ten cities. He who made five pounds received five cities;
each according to his capacity of rule, and in proportion
to his faithfulness. Compare @1Co
15:41. "There is no half reward of the saints. It is
either lost altogether, or received in full; in
full communion with God" [BENGEL].
Still no service of minister or people shall fail to
receive its reward.
9. The loss (@2Jo
1:8) meant is here explained: the not having God,
which results from abiding not in the doctrine of
Christ.
transgresseth--The oldest manuscripts and
versions read, "Every one who takes the lead";
literally, "goes," or "leads on before"; compare @Joh
10:4, "He goeth before them" (not the same Greek).
Compare @3Jo
1:9, "Loveth to have the pre-eminence."
hath not God--(@1Jo
2:23 5:15). The second "of Christ" is omitted in the
oldest manuscripts, but is understood in the sense.
He--emphatical: He
and He alone.
10. If there come any--as a
teacher or brother. The Greek is indicative, not
subjunctive; implying that such persons do actually
come, and are sure to come; when any comes, as
there will. True love is combined with hearty renunciation
and separation from all that is false, whether persons or
doctrines.
receive him not . . . neither bid him God speed--This
is not said of those who were always aliens from the
Church, but of those who wish to be esteemed brethren, and
subvert the true doctrine [GROTIUS].
The greeting salutation forbidden in the case of such a
one is that usual among Christian brethren in those
days, not a mere formality, but a token of
Christian brotherhood.
11. By wishing a false
brother or teacher "God (or 'good') speed," you
imply that he is capable as such of good speed and joy
(the literal meaning of the Greek), and that you
wish him it while opposing Christ; so you identify
yourself with "his evil deeds." The Greek of
"partaker" is "having communion with." We cannot have
communion with saints and with Antichrist at the same
time. Here we see John's naturally fiery zeal directed to
a right end. POLYCARP,
the disciple of John, told contemporaries of IRENĈUS,
who narrates the story on their authority, that on one
occasion when John was about to bathe, and heard that
Cerinthus, the heretic, was within, he retired with
abhorrence, exclaiming, Surely the house will fall in
ruins since the enemy of the truth is there.
12. I would not write--A
heart full of love pours itself out more freely face to
face, than by letter.
paper--made of Egyptian papyrus. Pens were
then reeds spliterally
ink--made of soot and water, thickened with
gum. Parchment was used for the permanent manuscripts in
which the Epistles were preserved. Writing tablets
were used merely for temporary purposes, as our slates.
face to face--literally, "mouth to mouth."
full--Greek, "filled full." Your joy
will be complete in hearing from me in person the joyful
Gospel truths which I now defer communicating till I see
you. On other occasions his writing the glad truths was
for the same purpose.
13. ALFORD
confesses that the non-mention of the "lady" herself here
seems rather to favor the hypothesis that a Church
is meant.
|
|