| |
THE SECOND
EPISTLE OF PAUL THE APOSTLE TO THE
CORINTHIANS
Commentary by A. R. FAUSSETT
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
INTRODUCTION
THE following reasons seem to have induced Paul to write
this Second Epistle to the Corinthians: (1) That he might
explain the reasons for his having deferred to pay them
his promised visit, by taking Corinth as his way to
Macedonia (@1Co
4:19 2Co 1:15,16; compare @1Co
16:5); and so that he might set forth to them his
apostolic walk in general (@2Co
1:12,24 6:3-13 7:2). (2) That he might commend their
obedience in reference to the directions in his First
Epistle, and at the same time direct them now to forgive
the offender, as having been punished sufficiently (@2Co
2:1-11 7:6-16). (3) That he might urge them to collect
for the poor saints at Jerusalem (@2Co
8:1-9,15). (4) That he might maintain his apostolic
authority and reprove gainsayers.
The external testimonies for its genuineness are
IRENĈUS [Against Heresies, 3,7,1]; ATHENAGORAS [Of
the Resurrection of the Dead]; CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA [Miscellanies,
3, p. 94; 4, p. 101]; TERTULLIAN [On Modesty, 13].
The TIME OF WRITING was after Pentecost, A.D. 57, when
Paul left Ephesus for Troas. Having stayed in the latter
place for some time preaching the Gospel with effect (@2Co
2:12), he went on to Macedonia, being eager to meet
Titus there, having been disappointed in his not coming to
Troas, as had been agreed on between them. Having heard
from him the tidings he so much desired of the good effect
produced on the Corinthians by his First Epistle, and
after having tested the liberality of the Macedonian
churches (@2Co
8:1), he wrote this Second Epistle, and then went on
to Greece, where he abode for three months; and then,
after travelling by land, reached Philippi on his return
at Passover or Easter, A.D. 58 (@Ac
20:1-6). So that this Epistle must have been written
about autumn, A.D. 57.
Macedonia was THE PLACE from which it was written (@2Co
9:2, where the present tense, "I boast," or
"am boasting," implies his presence then
in Macedonia). In Asia (Lydian Asia) he had undergone some
great peril of his life (@2Co
1:8,9), whether the reference be [PALEY] to the tumult
at Ephesus (@Ac
19:23-41), or, as ALFORD thinks, to a dangerous
illness in which he despaired of life. Thence he passed by
Troas to Philippi, the first city which would meet him in
entering Macedonia. The importance of the Philippian
Church would induce him to stay there some time; as also
his desire to collect contributions from the Macedonian
churches for the poor saints at Jerusalem. His anxiety of
mind is recorded (@2Co
7:5) as occurring when he came into Macedonia,
and therefore must have been at Philippi, which was
the first city of Macedonia in coming from Troas; and
here, too, from @2Co
7:6, compared with @2Co
7:5, must have been the scene of his receiving the
comforting tidings from Titus. "Macedonia" is
used for Philippi in @2Co
11:9, as is proved by comparison with @Php
4:15,16. So it is probably used here (@2Co
7:5). ALFORD argues from @2Co
8:1, where he speaks of the "grace bestowed on
the churches (plural) of Macedonia," that Paul
must have visited other churches in Macedonia,
besides Philippi, when he wrote, for example,
Thessalonica, Berea, &c., and that Philippi, the first
on his route, is less likely to have been the scene of his
writing than the last on his route, whichever it
was, perhaps Thessalonica. But Philippi, as being the
chief town of the province, was probably the place to
which all the collections of the churches were sent.
Ancient tradition, too (as appears from the subscription
to this Epistle), favors the view that Philippi was the
place from which this Epistle was sent by the hands of
Titus who received, besides, a charge to prosecute at
Corinth the collection which he had begun at his first
visit (@2Co
8:6).
The STYLE is most varied, and passes rapidly from one
phase of feeling to another; now joyous and consolatory,
again severe and full of reproof; at one time gentle and
affectionate, at another, sternly rebuking opponents and
upholding his dignity as an apostle. This variety of style
accords with the warm and earnest character of the
apostle, which nowhere is manifested more beautifully than
in this Epistle. His bodily frailty, and the chronic
malady under which he suffered, and which is often alluded
to (@2Co
4:7 5:1-4 12:7-9; compare Note, see on 2Co
1:8), must have been especially trying to one of his
ardent temperament. But besides this, was the more
pressing anxiety of the "care of all the
churches." At Corinth, as elsewhere, Judaizing
emissaries wished to bind legal fetters of letter and form
(compare @2Co
3:3-18) on the freedom and catholicity of the Church.
On the other hand, there were free thinkers who defended
their immorality of practice by infidel theories (@1Co
15:12,32-36). These were the "fightings
without," and "fears within" (@2Co
7:5,6) which agitated the apostle's mind until Titus
brought him comforting tidings from Corinth. Even then,
while the majority at Corinth had testified their
repentance, and, as Paul had desired, excommunicated the
incestuous person, and contributed for the poor Christians
of Judea, there was still a minority who, more
contemptuously than ever, resisted the apostle. These
accused him of crafty and mercenary motives, as if he had
personal gain in view in the collection being made; and
this, notwithstanding his scrupulous care to be above the
possibility of reasonable suspicion, by having others
besides himself to take charge of the money. This
insinuation was palpably inconsistent with their other
charge, that he could be no true apostle, as he did not
claim maintenance from the churches which he founded.
Another accusation they brought of cowardly weakness; that
he was always threatening severe measures without daring
to execute them (@2Co
10:8-16 13:2); and that he was vacillating in his
teaching and practice, circumcising Timothy, and yet
withholding circumcision from Titus; a Jew among the Jews,
and a Greek among the Greeks. That most of these opponents
were of the Judaizing party in the Church, appears from @2Co
11:22. They seem to have been headed by an emissary
from Judea ("he that cometh," @2Co
11:4), who had brought "letters of
commendation" (@2Co
3:1) from members of the Church at Jerusalem, and who
boasted of his purity of Hebrew descent, and his close
connection with Christ Himself (@2Co
11:13,23). His partisans contrasted his high
pretensions with the timid humility of Paul (@1Co
2:3); and his rhetoric with the apostle's plain and
unadorned style (@2Co
11:6,10:10,13). It was this state of things at
Corinth, reported by Titus, that caused Paul to send him
back forthwith thither with this Second Epistle, which is
addressed, not to Corinth only (@1Co
1:2), but to all the churches also in Achaia (@2Co
1:1), which had in some degree been affected by the
same causes as affected the Corinthian Church. The widely
different tone in different parts of the Epistle is due to
the diversity which existed at Corinth between the
penitent majority and the refractory minority. The former
he addresses with the warmest affection; the latter with
menace and warning. Two deputies, chosen by the churches
to take charge of the contribution to be collected at
Corinth, accompanied Titus (@2Co
8:18,19,22).
|
|