| |
THE FIRST EPISTLE
OF PAUL THE APOSTLE TO THE
CORINTHIANS
Commentary by A. R.
FAUSSETT
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
CHAPTER 2
@1Co
2:1-16. PAUL'S SUBJECT OF PREACHING, CHRIST CRUCIFIED,
NOT IN WORLDLY, BUT IN HEAVENLY, WISDOM AMONG THE PERFECT.
1. And I--"So I" [CONYBEARE] as one of the
"foolish, weak, and despised" instruments employed
by God (@1Co
1:27,28); "glorying in the Lord," not in man's
wisdom (@1Co
1:31). Compare @1Co
1:23, "We."
when I came--(@Ac
18:1, &c.). Paul might, had he pleased, have used an
ornate style, having studied secular learning at Tarsus of
Cilicia, which STRABO preferred as a school of learning to
Athens or Alexandria; here, doubtless, he read the Cilician
Aratus' poems (which he quotes, @Ac
17:28), and Epimenides (@Tit
1:12), and MENANDER (@1Co
15:33). Grecian intellectual development was an
important element in preparing the way for the Gospel, but
it failed to regenerate the world, showing that for this a
superhuman power is needed. Hellenistic (Grecizing) Judaism
at Tarsus and Alexandria was the connecting link between the
schools of Athens and those of the Rabbis. No more fitting
birthplace could there have been for the apostle of the
Gentiles than Tarsus, free as it was from the warping
influences of Rome, Alexandria, and Athens. He had at the
same time Roman citizenship, which protected him from
sudden violence. Again, he was reared in the Hebrew
divine law at Jerusalem. Thus, as the three elements,
Greek cultivation, Roman polity (@Lu
2:1), and the divine law given to the Jews, combined
just at Christ's time, to prepare the world for the Gospel,
so the same three, by God's marvellous providence, met
together in the apostle to the Gentiles [CONYBEARE and
HOWSON].
testimony of God--"the
testimony of Christ" (@1Co
1:6); therefore Christ is God.
2. The Greek implies, "The only definite
thing that I made it my business to know among you, was to
know Jesus Christ (His person) and Him crucified (His
office)" [ALFORD], not exalted on the earthly throne of
David, but executed as the vilest malefactor. The historical
fact of Christ's crucifixion had probably been put less
prominently forward by the seekers after human wisdom in the
Corinthian church, to avoid offending learned heathens and
Jews. Christ's person and Christ's office
constitute the sum of the Gospel.
3. I--the preacher: as @1Co
2:2 describes the subject, "Christ
crucified," and @1Co
2:4 the mode of preaching: "my speech . . .
not with enticing words," "but in demonstration of
the Spirit."
weakness--personal and
bodily (@2Co
10:10 12:7,9 Ga 4:13).
trembling--(compare @Php
2:12). Not personal fear, but a trembling
anxiety to perform a duty; anxious conscientiousness, as
proved by the contrast to "eye service" (@Eph
6:5) [CONYBEARE and HOWSON].
4. my speech--in private.
preaching--in public [BENGEL].
ALFORD explains it, My discourse on doctrines, and my
preaching or announcement of facts.
enticing--rather,
"persuasive."
man's wisdom--man's
is omitted in the oldest authorities. Still
"wisdom" does refer to "man's" wisdom.
in demonstration of . . .
Spirit, &c.--Persuasion is man's means of
moving his fellow man. God's means is demonstration,
leaving no doubt, and inspiring implicit faith, by the
powerful working of the Spirit (then exhibited both
outwardly by miracles, and inwardly by working on the heart,
now in the latter and the more important way only, @Mt
7:29 Ac 6:10 Heb 4:12; compare also @Ro
15:19). The same simple power accompanies divine truth
now, producing certain persuasion and conversion, when the
Spirit demonstrates by it.
5. stand in . . . wisdom of men--rest on
it, owe its origin and continuance to it.
6, 7. Yet the Gospel preaching, so far from being at
variance with true "wisdom," is a wisdom
infinitely higher than that of the wise of the world.
we speak--resuming
"we" (preachers, I, Apollos, &c.). from
"we preach" (@1Co
1:28), only that here, "we speak" refers to
something less public (compare @1Co
2:7,13, "mystery . . . hidden") than
"we preach," which is public. For
"wisdom" here denotes not the whole of Christian
doctrine, but its sublimer and deeper principles.
perfect--Those matured
in Christian experience and knowledge alone can
understand the true superiority of the Christian wisdom
which Paul preached. Distinguished not only from worldly
and natural men, but also from babes, who
though "in Christ" retain much that is
"carnal" (@1Co
3:1,2), and cannot therefore understand the deeper
truths of Christianity (@1Co
14:20 Php 3:15 Heb 5:14). Paul does not mean by the
"mystery" or "hidden wisdom" (@1Co
2:7) some hidden tradition distinct from the Gospel
(like the Church of Rome's disciplina arcani and
doctrine of reserve), but the unfolding of the
treasures of knowledge, once hidden in God's counsels, but now
announced to all, which would be intelligently comprehended
in proportion as the hearer's inner life became perfectly
transformed into the image of Christ. Compare instances of
such "mysteries," that is, deeper Christian
truths, not preached at Paul's first coming to Corinth, when
he confined himself to the fundamental elements (@1Co
2:2), but now spoken to the "perfect" (@1Co
15:51 Ro 11:25 Eph 3:5,6). "Perfect" is used
not of absolute perfection, but relatively to
"babes," or those less ripe in Christian growth
(compare @Php
3:12,15, with @1Jo
2:12-14). "God" (@1Co
2:7) is opposed to the world, the apostles to "the
princes [great and learned men] of this world" (@1Co
2:8; compare @1Co
1:20) [BENGEL].
come to naught--nothingness
(@1Co
1:28). They are transient, not immortal. Therefore,
their wisdom is not real [BENGEL]. Rather, translate with
ALFORD, "Which are being brought to
naught," namely, by God's choosing the "things
which are not (the weak and despised things of the Gospel),
to bring to naught (the same verb as here) things that
are" (@1Co
1:28).
7. wisdom of God--emphatically contrasted with the
wisdom of men and of this world (@1Co
2:5,6).
in a mystery--connected
in construction with "we speak": We speak as
dealing with a mystery; that is not something to be kept
hidden, but what heretofore was so, but is now
revealed. Whereas the pagan mysteries were revealed only
to a chosen few, the Gospel mysteries were made known to all
who would obey the truth. "If our Gospel be hid,
it is hid to them that are lost" (@2Co
4:3), "whom the God of this world hath blinded."
Ordinarily we use "mystery" in reference to those
from whom the knowledge is withheld; the apostles, in
reference to those to whom it is revealed [WHATELY].
It is hidden before it is brought forward, and when it is
brought forward it still remains hidden to those that are
imperfect [BENGEL].
ordained--literally,
"foreordained" (compare @1Co
2:9), "prepared for them that love Him."
before the world--rather,
"before the ages" (of time), that is, from
eternity. This infinitely antedates worldly wisdom in
antiquity. It was before not only the wisdom of the world,
but eternally before the world itself and its ages.
to our glory--ours
both now and hereafter, from "the Lord of glory"
(@1Co
2:8), who brings to naught "the princes of
this world."
8. Which--wisdom. The strongest proof of the natural
man's destitution of heavenly wisdom.
crucified . . .
Lord of glory--implying the inseparable connection of
Christ's humanity and His divinity. The Lord of glory (which
He had in His own right before the world was, @Joh
17:4,24) was crucified.
9. But--(it has happened) as it is written.
Eye hath not seen,
&c.--ALFORD translates, "The things which eye saw
not . . . the things which God prepared . . .
to us God revealed through His Spirit." Thus, however,
the "but" of @1Co
2:10 is ignored. Rather construe, as ESTIUS, "('We
speak,' supplied from @1Co
2:8), things which eye saw not (heretofore), . . .
things which God prepared . . . But God revealed
them to us," &c. The quotation is not a verbatim
one, but an inspired exposition of the
"wisdom" (@1Co
2:6, from @Isa
64:4). The exceptive words, "O God, beside
(that is, except) Thee," are not quoted directly, but
are virtually expressed in the exposition of them (@1Co
2:10), "None but thou, O God, seest these
mysteries, and God hath revealed them to us by His
Spirit."
entered--literally,
"come up into the heart." A Hebraism (compare, @Jer
3:16, Margin). In @Isa
64:4 it is "Prepared (literally, 'will do') for him
that waiteth for Him"; here, "for them that
love Him." For Isaiah spake to them who waited
for Messiah's appearance as future; Paul, to them who
love Him as having actually appeared (@1Jo
4:19); compare @1Co
2:12, "the things that are freely given to us of
God"
10. revealed . . . by . . . Spirit--The
inspiration of thoughts (so far as truth essential to
salvation is concerned) makes the Christian (@1Co
3:16 12:3 Mt 16:17 Joh 16:13 1Jo 2:20,27); that of words,
the PROPHET (@2Sa
23:1,2 1Ki 13:1,5), "by the word of the
Lord" (@1Co
2:13 Joh 20:30,31 2Pe 1:21). The secrets of revelation
are secret to some, not because those who know them will not
reveal them (for indeed, the very notion of revelation
implies an unveiling of what had been veiled), but because
those to whom they are announced have not the will or power
to comprehend them. Hence the Spirit-taught alone know these
secrets (@Ps
25:14 Pr 3:32 Joh 7:17 15:15).
unto us--the
"perfect" or fully matured in Christian experience
(@1Co
2:6). Intelligent men may understand the outline of
doctrines; but without the Holy Spirit's revelation to the
heart, these will be to them a mere outline--a skeleton,
correct perhaps, but wanting life [WHATLEY, Cautions for
the Times, 14], (@Lu
10:21).
the Spirit searcheth--working
in us and with our spirits (compare @Ro
8:16,26,27). The Old Testament shows us God (the Father)
for us. The Gospels, God (the Son) with us. The Acts and
Epistles, God (the Holy Ghost) in us [MONOD], (@Ga
3:14).
deep things of God--(@Ps
92:5). His divine nature, attributes, and counsels. The
Spirit delights to explore the infinite depths of His own
divine mind, and then reveal them to us, according as we are
capable of understanding them (@De
29:29). This proves the personality and Godhead of the
Holy Ghost. Godhead cannot be separated from the Spirit of
God, as manhood cannot be separated from the Spirit of man [BENGEL].
11. what man, &c.--literally, "who of men
knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of that
man?"
things of God knoweth no
man--rather, "none knoweth," not angel
or man. This proves the impossibility of any knowing the
things of God, save by the Spirit of God (who alone knows
them, since even in the case of man, so infinitely inferior
in mind to God, none of his fellow men, but his own spirit
alone knows the things hidden within him).
12. we . . . received, not . . .
spirit of . . . world--the personal evil
"spirit that now worketh in the children of
disobedience" (@Eph
2:2). This spirit is natural in the unregenerate, and
needs not to be received.
Spirit which is of God--that
is, which comes from God. We have received it only by the gift
of God, whose Spirit it is, whereas our own spirit is the
spirit that is in us men (@1Co
2:11).
that we might know . . .
things . . . freely given . . . of God--present
experimental knowledge, to our unspeakable comfort, of His
deep mysteries of wisdom, and of our future possession of
the good "things which God hath prepared for them that
love Him" (@1Co
2:9).
13. also--We not only know by the Holy Ghost,
but we also speak the "things freely given to us
of God" (@1Co
2:12).
which the Holy Ghost
teacheth--The old manuscripts read "the
Spirit" simply, without "Holy."
comparing spiritual things
with spiritual--expounding the Spirit-inspired Old
Testament Scripture, by comparison with the Gospel which
Jesus by the same Spirit revealed [GROTIUS]; and conversely
illustrating the Gospel mysteries by comparing them with the
Old Testament types [CHRYSOSTOM]. So the Greek word
is translated, "comparing" (@2Co
10:12). WAHL (Key of the New Testament)
translates, "explaining (as the Greek is
translated, @Ge
40:8, the Septuagint) to spiritual (that is,
Spirit-taught) men, spiritual things (the things which we
ourselves are taught by the Spirit)." Spirit-taught men
alone can comprehend spiritual truths. This accords with @1Co
2:6,9,10,14,15 1Co 3:1. ALFORD translates, "Putting
together (combining) spirituals with spirituals"; that
is, attaching spiritual words to spiritual things,
which we should not do, if we were to use words of worldly
wisdom to expound spiritual things (so @1Co
2:1,4 1Pe 4:11). Perhaps the generality of the neuters
is designed to comprehend these several notions by
implication. Comparing, or combining, spirituals with
spirituals; implying both that spiritual things are only
suited to spiritual persons (so "things"
comprehended persons, @1Co
1:27), and also that spiritual truths can only be
combined with spiritual (not worldly-wise) words; and
lastly, spirituals of the Old and New Testaments can only be
understood by mutual comparison or combination, not by
combination with worldly "wisdom," or natural
perceptions (@1Co
1:21,22 2:1,4-9; compare @Ps
119:18).
14. natural man--literally, "a man of animal
soul." As contrasted with the spiritual man, he
is governed by the animal soul, which overbears his spirit,
which latter is without the Spirit of God (@Jude
1:19). So the animal (English Version,
"natural") body, or body led by the lower animal
nature (including both the mere human fallen reason
and heart), is contrasted with the Spirit-quickened
body (@1Co
15:44-46). The carnal man (the man led by bodily
appetites, and also by a self-exalting spirit, estranged
from the divine life) is closely akin; so too the
"earthly." "Devilish," or
"demon-like"; "led by an evil spirit,"
is the awful character of such a one, in its worst type (@Jas
3:15).
receiveth not--though
they are offered to him, and are "worthy of being received
by all men" (@1Ti
1:15).
they are foolishness unto
him--whereas he seeks "wisdom" (@1Co
1:22).
neither can he--Not
only does he not, but he cannot know them, and
therefore has no wish to "receive" them (@Ro
8:7).
15. He that is spiritual--literally, "the
spiritual (man)." In @1Co
2:14, it is "A [not 'the,' as English
Version] natural man." The spiritual is the
man distinguished above his fellow men, as he in whom the
Spirit rules. In the unregenerate, the spirit which ought to
be the organ of the Holy Spirit (and which is so in the
regenerate), is overridden by the animal soul, and is in
abeyance, so that such a one is never called
"spiritual."
judgeth all things--and
persons, by their true standard (compare @1Co
6:2-4 1Jo 4:1), in so far as he is spiritual. "Discerneth
. . . is discerned," would better accord with
the translation of the same Greek (@1Co
2:14). Otherwise for "discerned," in @1Co
2:14, translate, "judged of," to accord with
the translation, "judgeth . . . is
judged" in this fifteenth verse. He has a practical
insight into the verities of the Gospel, though he is not
infallible on all theoretical points. If an individual may
have the Spirit without being infallible, why may not the
Church have the Spirit, and yet not be infallible (a
refutation of the plea of Rome for the Church's
infallibility, from @Mt
28:20 Joh 16:13)? As the believer and the Church have
the Spirit, and are yet not therefore impeccable, so he and
the Church have the Spirit, and yet are not infallible or
impeccable. He and the Church are both infallible and
impeccable, only in proportion to the degree in which
they are led by the Spirit. The Spirit leads into all truth
and holiness; but His influence on believers and on the
Church is as yet partial. Jesus alone, who had the Spirit
without measure (@Joh
3:34), is both infallible and impeccable. Scripture,
because it was written by men, who while writing were
infallibly inspired, is unmixed truth (@Pr
28:5 1Jo 2:27).
16. For--proof of @1Co
2:15, that the spiritual man "is judged of no
man." In order to judge the spiritual man, the ordinary
man must "know the mind of the Lord." But
"who of ordinary men knows" that?
that he may instruct him--that
is, so as to be able to set Him right as His counsellor
(quoted from @Isa
40:13,14). So the Septuagint translates the Greek
verb, which means to "prove," in @Ac
9:22. Natural men who judge spiritual men, living
according to the mind of God ("We have the mind of
Christ"), are virtually wishing to instruct God, and
bring Him to another mind, as counsellors setting to right
their king.
we have the mind of Christ--in
our degree of capability to apprehend it. @Isa
40:13,14 refers to JEHOVAH: therefore, as it is applied
here to Christ, He is Jehovah.
|
|