|
Galatians
Chapter IV
VERSE 1.
Now I say, That the heir, as long as he is
a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be
Lord of all;
VERSE
2. But is under tutors and governors
until the time appointed of the father.
The
Apostle had apparently finished his discourse on
justification when this illustration of the youthful heir
occurred to him. He throws it in for good measure. He
knows that plain people are sooner impressed by an apt
illustration than by learned discussion.
"I
want to give you another illustration from everyday
life," he writes to the Galatians. "As long as
an heir is under age he is treated very much like a
servant. He is not permitted to order his own affairs. He
is kept under constant surveillance. Such discipline is
good for him, otherwise he would waste his inheritance in
no time. This discipline, however, is not to last forever.
It is to last only until 'the time appointed of the
father.'"
VERSE
3. Even so we, when we were children,
were in bondage under the elements of the world.
As
children of the Law we were treated like servants and
prisoners. We were oppressed and condemned by the Law. But
the tyranny of the Law is not to last forever. It is to
last only until "the time appointed of the
father," until Christ came and redeemed us.
VERSE
3. Under the elements of the world.
By
the elements of the world the Apostle does not understand
the physical elements, as some have thought. In calling
the Law "the elements of the world" Paul means
to say that the Law is something material, mundane,
earthly. It may restrain evil, but it does not deliver
from sin. The Law does not justify; it does not bring a
person to
heaven. I do not obtain eternal life because I do not
kill, commit adultery, steal, etc. Such mere outward
decency does not constitute Christianity. The heathen
observe the same restraints to avoid punishment or to
secure the advantages of a good reputation. In the last
analysis such restraint is simple hypocrisy. When the Law
exercises its higher function it accuses and condemns the
conscience. All these effects of the Law cannot be called
divine or heavenly. These effects are elements of the
world.
In
calling the Law the elements of the world Paul refers to
the whole Law, principally to the ceremonial law which
dealt with external matters, as meat, drink, dress,
places, times, feasts, cleansings, sacrifices, etc. These
are mundane matters which cannot save the sinner.
Ceremonial laws are like the statutes of governments
dealing with purely civil matters, as commerce,
inheritance, etc. As for the pope's church laws forbidding
marriage and meats, Paul calls them elsewhere the
doctrines of devils. You would not call such laws elements
of heaven.
The
Law of Moses deals with mundane matters. It holds the
mirror to the evil which is in the world. By revealing the
evil that is in us it creates a longing in the heart for
the better things of God. The Law forces us into the arms
of Christ, "
who is the end of the law for righteousness to every one
that believeth
." (Romans 1:4.) Christ relieves the conscience of
the Law. In so far as the Law impels us to Christ it
renders excellent service.
I
do not mean to give the impression that the Law should be
despised. Neither does Paul intend to leave that
impression. The Law ought to be honored. But when it is a
matter of justification before God, Paul had to speak
disparagingly of the Law, because the Law has nothing to
do with justification. If it thrusts its nose into the
business of justification we must talk harshly to the Law
to keep it in its place. The conscience ought not to be on
speaking terms with the Law. The conscience ought to know
only Christ. To say this is easy, but in times of trial,
when the conscience writhes in the presence of God,
it is not so easy to do. As such times we are to believe
in Christ as if there were no Law or sin anywhere, but
only Christ. We ought to say to the Law: "Mister Law,
I do not get you. You stutter so much. I don't think that
you have anything to say to me."
When
it is not a question of salvation or justification with
us, we are to think highly of the Law and call it "
holy, just, and good
." (Romans 7:12) The Law is of no comfort to a
stricken conscience. Therefore it should not be allowed to
rule in our conscience, particularly in view of the fact
that Christ paid so great a price to deliver the
conscience from the tyranny of the Law. Let us understand
that the Law and Christ are impossible bedfellows. The Law
must leave the bed of the conscience, which is so narrow
that it cannot hold two, as @Isaiah
says, chapter 28, verse 20.
Only
Paul among the apostles calls the Law "the elements
of the world, weak and beggarly elements, the strength of
sin, the letter that killeth," etc. The other
apostles do not speak so slightingly of the Law. Those who
want to be first-class scholars in the school of Christ
want to pick up the language of Paul. Christ called him a
chosen vessel and equipped with a facility of expression
far above that of the other apostles, that he as the
chosen vessel should establish the doctrine of
justification in clear-cut words.
VERSES
4, 5. But when the fullness of the
time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman,
made under the law, to redeem them that were under the
law.
"The
fullness of the time" means when the time of the Law
was fulfilled and Christ was revealed. Note how Paul
explains Christ. "Christ," says he, "is the
Son of God and the son of a woman. He submitted Himself
under the Law to redeem us who were under the Law."
In these words the Apostle explains the person and office
of Christ. His person is divine and human. "God sent
forth His Son,
made of a woman." Christ therefore is true God and
true man. Christ's office the Apostle describes in the
words: "Made under the law, to redeem them that were
under the law."
Paul
calls the Virgin Mary a woman. This has been frequently
deplored even by some of the ancient fathers who felt that
Paul should have written "virgin" instead of
woman. But Paul is now treating of faith and Christian
righteousness, of the person and office of Christ, not of
the virginity of Mary. The inestimable mercy of God is
sufficiently set forth by the fact that His Son was born
of a woman. The more general term "woman"
indicates that Christ was born a true man. Paul does not
say that Christ was born of man and woman, but only of
woman. That he has a virgin in mind is obvious.
This
passage furthermore declares that Christ's purpose in
coming was the abolition of the Law, not with the
intention of laying down new laws, but "to redeem
them that were under the law." Christ himself
declared: "
I judge no man
." (John 8:15.) Again, "
I came not to judge the world, but to save the world
." (John 12:47.) In other words: "I came not to
bring more laws, or to judge men according to the existing
Law. I have a higher and better office. I came to judge
and to condemn the Law, so that it may no more judge and
condemn the world."
How
did Christ manage to redeem us? "He was made under
the law." When Christ came He found us all in prison.
What did He do about it? Although He was the Lord of the
Law, He voluntarily placed Himself under the Law and
permitted it to exercise dominion over Him, indeed to
accuse and to condemn Him. When the Law takes us into
judgment it has a perfect right to do so. "
For we are by nature the children of wrath, even as others
." (Eph. 2:3.) Christ, however, "
did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth
." (I Pet. 2:22.) Hence the Law had no jurisdiction
over Him. Yet the Law treated this innocent, just, and
blessed Lamb of God as cruelly as it treated us.
It accused Him of blasphemy and treason. It made Him
guilty of the sins of the whole world. It overwhelmed him
with such anguish of soul that His sweat was as blood. The
Law condemned Him to the shameful death on the Cross.
It
is truly amazing that the Law had the effrontery to turn
upon its divine Author, and that without a show of right.
For its insolence the Law in turn was arraigned before the
judgment seat of God and condemned. Christ might have
overcome the Law by an exercise of His omnipotent
authority over the Law. Instead, He humbled Himself under
the Law for and together with them that were under the
Law. He gave the Law license to accuse and condemn Him.
His present mastery over the Law was obtained by virtue of
His Sonship and His substitutionary victory.
Thus
Christ banished the Law from the conscience. It dare no
longer banish us from God. For that matter,--the Law
continues to reveal sin. It still raises its voice in
condemnation. But the conscience finds quick relief in the
words of the Apostle: "Christ has redeemed us from
the law." The conscience can now hold its head high
and say to the Law: "You are not so holy yourself.
You crucified the Son of God. That was an awful thing for
you to do. You have lost your influence forever."
The
words, "Christ was made under the law," are
worth all the attention we can bestow on them. They
declare that the Son of God did not only fulfill one or
two easy requirements of the Law, but that He endured all
the tortures of the Law. The Law brought all its fright to
bear upon Christ until He experienced anguish and terror
such as nobody else ever experienced. His bloody sweat.
His need of angelic comfort, His tremulous prayer in the
garden, His lamentation on the Cross, "My God, my
God, why hast thou forsaken me?" bear eloquent
witness to the sting of the Law. He suffered "to
redeem them that were under the law."
The Roman conception of Christ as a mere lawgiver more
stringent than Moses, is quite contrary to Paul's
teaching. Christ, according to Paul, was not an agent of
the Law but a patient of the Law. He was not a law-giver,
but a law-taker.
True
enough, Christ also taught and expounded the Law. But it
was incidental. It was a sideline with Him. He did not
come into the world for the purpose of teaching the Law,
as little as it was the purpose of His coming to perform
miracles. Teaching the Law and performing miracles did not
constitute His unique mission to the world. The prophets
also taught the Law and performed miracles. In fact,
according to the promise of Christ, the apostles performed
greater miracles than Christ Himself. (@John
14:12.) The true purpose of Christ's coming was the
abolition of the Law, of sin, and of death.
If
we think of Christ as Paul here depicts Him, we shall
never go wrong. We shall never be in danger of
misconstruing the meaning of the Law. We shall understand
that the Law does not justify. We shall understand why a
Christian observes laws: For the peace of the world, out
of gratitude to God, and for a good example that others
may be attracted to the Gospel.
VERSE
5. That we might receive the adoption
of sons.
Paul
still has for his text Genesis 22:18, "
In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed
." In the course of his Epistle he calls this promise
of the blessing righteousness, life, deliverance from the
Law, the testament, etc. Now he also calls the promise of
blessing "the adoption of sons," the inheritance
of everlasting life.
What
ever induced God to adopt us for His children and heirs?
What claim can men who are subservient to sin, subject to
the curse of the Law, and worthy of everlasting death,
have on God and eternal life? That God adopted us is due
to the merit of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who humbled
Himself under the Law and redeemed us law-ridden sinners.
VERSE 6. And because
ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son
into your hearts.
In
the early Church the Holy Spirit was sent forth in visible
form. He descended upon Christ in the form of a dove (@Matt.
3:16), and in the likeness of fire upon the apostles
and other believers. (@Acts
2:3.) This visible outpouring of the Holy Spirit was
necessary to the establishment of the early Church, as
were also the miracles that accompanied the gift of the
Holy Ghost. Paul explained the purpose of these miraculous
gifts of the Spirit in I Corinthians 14:22, "
Tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to
them that believe not
." Once the Church had been established and properly
advertised by these miracles, the visible appearance of
the Holy Ghost ceased.
Next,
the Holy Ghost is sent forth into the hearts of the
believers, as here stated, "God sent the Spirit of
his Son into your hearts." This sending is
accomplished by the preaching of the Gospel through which
the Holy Spirit inspires us with fervor and light, with
new judgment, new desires, and new motives. This happy
innovation is not a derivative of reason or personal
development, but solely the gift and operation of the Holy
Ghost.
This
renewal by the Holy Spirit may not be conspicuous to the
world, but it is patent to us by our better judgment, our
improved speech, and our unashamed confession of Christ.
Formerly we did not confess Christ to be our only merit,
as we do now in the light of the Gospel. Why, then, should
we feel bad if the world looks upon us as ravagers of
religion and insurgents against constituted authority? We
confess Christ and our conscience approves of it.
Then,
too, we live in the fear of God. If we sin, we sin not on
purpose, but unwittingly, and we are sorry for it. Sin
sticks in our flesh, and the flesh gets us into sin even
after we have been imbued by the Holy Ghost. Outwardly
there is no great difference between a Christian and any
honest man. The activities of a Christian are not
sensational
. He performs his duty according to his vocation. He takes
good care of his family, and is kind and helpful to
others. Such homely, everyday performances are not much
admired. But the setting-up exercises of the monks draw
great applause. Holy works, you know. Only the acts of a
Christian are truly good and acceptable to God, because
they are done in faith, with a cheerful heart, out of
gratitude to Christ.
We
ought to have no misgivings about whether the Holy Ghost
dwells in us. We are "
the temple of the Holy Ghost
." (I Cor. 3:16.) When we have a love for the Word of
God, and gladly hear, talk, write, and think of Christ, we
are to know that this inclination toward Christ is the
gift and work of the Holy Ghost. Where you come across
contempt for the Word of God, there is the devil. We meet
with such contempt for the Word of God mostly among the
common people. They act as though the Word of God does not
concern them. Wherever you find a love for the Word, thank
God for the Holy Spirit who infuses this love into the
hearts of men. We never come by this love naturally,
neither can it be enforced by laws. It is the gift of the
Holy Spirit.
The
Roman theologians teach that no man can know for a
certainty whether he stands in the favor of God or not.
This teaching forms one of the chief articles of their
faith. With this teaching they tormented men's
consciences, excommunicated Christ from the Church, and
limited the operations of the Holy Ghost.
St.
Augustine observed that "every man is certain
of his faith, if he has faith." This the Romanists
deny. "God forbid," they exclaim piously,
"that I should ever be so arrogant as to think that I
stand in grace, that I am holy, or that I have the Holy
Ghost." We ought to feel sure that we stand in the
grace of God, not in view of our own worthiness, but
through the good services of Christ. As certain as we are
that Christ pleases God, so sure ought we to be that we
also please God, because Christ is in us. And although we
daily offend God by our sins, yet as often as
we sin, God's mercy bends over us. Therefore sin cannot
get us to doubt the grace of God. Our certainty is of
Christ, that mighty Hero who overcame the Law, sin, death,
and all evils. So long as He sits at the right hand of God
to intercede for us, we have nothing to fear from the
anger of God.
This
inner assurance of the grace of God is accompanied by
outward indications such as gladly to hear, preach,
praise, and to confess Christ, to do one's duty in the
station in which God has placed us, to aid the needy, and
to comfort the sorrowing. These are the affidavits of the
Holy Spirit testifying to our favorable standing with God.
If
we could be fully persuaded that we are in the good grace
of God, that our sins are forgiven, that we have the
Spirit of Christ, that we are the beloved children of God,
we would be ever so happy and grateful to God. But because
we often feel fear and doubt we cannot come to that happy
certainty.
Train
your conscience to believe that God approves of you. Fight
it out with doubt. Gain assurance through the Word of God.
Say: "I am all right with God. I have the Holy Ghost.
Christ, in whom I do believe, makes me worthy. I gladly
hear, read, sing, and write of Him. I would like nothing
better than that Christ's Gospel be known throughout the
world and that many, many be brought to faith in
Him."
VERSE
6. Crying, Abba, Father.
Paul
might have written, "God sent forth the Spirit of his
Son into your hearts, calling Abba, Father." Instead,
he wrote, "Crying, Abba, Father." In the eighth
chapter of the Epistle to the Romans the Apostle describes
this crying of the Spirit as "groanings which cannot
be uttered." He writes in the 26th verse:
"Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities:
for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but
the Spirit itself maketh
intercession for us with groanings which cannot be
uttered."
The
fact that the Spirit of Christ in our hearts cries unto
God and makes intercession for us with groanings should
reassure us greatly. However, there are many factors that
prevent such full reassurance on our part. We are born in
sin. To doubt the good will of God is an inborn suspicion
of God with all of us. Besides, the devil, our adversary,
goeth about seeking to devour us by roaring: "God is
angry at you and is going to destroy you forever." In
all these difficulties we have only one support, the
Gospel of Christ. To hold on to it, that is the trick.
Christ cannot be perceived with the senses. We cannot see
Him. The heart does not feel His helpful presence.
Especially in times of trials a Christian feels the power
of sin, the infirmity of his flesh, the goading darts of
the devil, the agues of death, the scowl and judgment of
God. All these things cry out against us. The Law scolds
us, sin screams at us, death thunders at us, the devil
roars at us. In the midst of the clamor the Spirit of
Christ cries in our hearts: "Abba, Father." And
this little cry of the Spirit transcends the hullabaloo of
the Law, sin, death, and the devil, and finds a hearing
with God.
The
Spirit cries in us because of our weakness. Because of our
infirmity the Holy Ghost is sent forth into our hearts to
pray for us according to the will of God and to assure us
of the grace of God.
Let
the Law, sin, and the devil cry out against us until their
outcry fills heaven and earth. The Spirit of God outcries
them all. Our feeble groans, "Abba, Father,"
will be heard of God sooner than the combined racket of
hell, sin, and the Law.
We
do not think of our groanings as a crying. It is so faint
we do not know we are groaning.
"But he," says Paul, "that searcheth the
hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit."
(Romans 8:27.) To this Searcher of hearts our feeble
groaning, as it seems to us, is a loud shout for help in
comparison with which the howls of hell, the din
of the devil, the yells of the Law, the shouts of sin are
like so many whispers.
In
the fourteenth chapter of Exodus the Lord addresses Moses
at the Red Sea: "
Wherefore criest thou unto me?
" Moses had not cried unto the Lord. He trembled so
he could hardly talk. His faith was at low ebb. He saw the
people of Israel wedged between the Sea and the
approaching armies of Pharaoh. How were they to escape?
Moses did not know what to say. How then could God say
that Moses was crying to Him? God heard the groaning heart
of Moses and the groans to Him sounded like loud shouts
for help. God is quick to catch the sigh of the heart.
Some
have claimed that the saints are without infirmities. But
Paul says: "The Spirit helpeth our infirmities, and
maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be
uttered." We need the help of the Holy Spirit because
we are weak and infirm. And the Holy Spirit never
disappoints us. Confronted by the armies of Pharaoh,
retreat cut off by the waters of the Red Sea, Moses was in
a bad spot. He felt himself to blame. The devil accused
him: "These people will all perish, for they cannot
escape. And you are to blame because you led the people
out of Egypt. You started all this." And then the
people started in on Moses. "
Because there were no graves in Egypt, hast thou taken us
away to die in the wilderness? For it had been better for
us to serve the Egyptians, than that we should die in the
wilderness.
" (Ex. 14:11, 12.) But the Holy Ghost was in Moses
and made intercession for him with unutterable groanings,
sighings unto the Lord: "O Lord, at Thy commandment
have I led forth this people. So help me now."
The
Spirit intercedes for us not in many words or long
prayers, but with groanings, with little sounds like
"Abba." Small as this word is, it says ever so
much. It says: "My Father, I am in great trouble and
you seem so far away. But I know I am your child, because
you are my Father for Christ's sake. I am loved by you
because of the
Beloved." This one little word "Abba"
surpasses the eloquence of a Demosthenes and a Cicero.
I
have spent much time on this verse in order to combat the
cruel teaching of the Roman church, that a person ought to
be kept in a state of uncertainty concerning his status
with God. The monasteries recruit the youth on the plea
that their "holy" orders will assuredly recruit
them for heaven. But once inside the monastery the
recruits are told to doubt the promises of God.
In
support of their error the papists quote the saying of
Solomon: "
The righteous, and the wise, and their works, are in the
hand of God: no man knoweth either love or hatred by all
that is before them
." (Eccles. 9:1.) They take this hatred to mean the
wrath of God to come. Others take it to mean God's present
anger. None of them seem to understand this passage from
Solomon. On every page the Scriptures urge us to believe
that God is merciful, loving, and patient; that He is
faithful and true, and that He keeps His promises. All the
promises of God were fulfilled in the gift of His only-
begotten Son, that "whosoever believeth in him should
not perish, but have everlasting life." The Gospel is
reassurance for sinners. Yet this one saying from Solomon,
misinterpreted at that, is made to count for more than all
the many promises of all the Scriptures.
If
our opponents are so uncertain about their status with
God, and even go so far as to say that the conscience
ought to be kept in a state of doubt, why is it that they
persecute us as vile heretics? When it comes to
persecuting us they do not seem to be in doubt and
uncertainty one minute.
Let
us not fail to thank God for delivering us from the
doctrine of doubt. The Gospel commands us to look away
from our own good works to the promises of God in Christ,
the Mediator. The pope commands us to look away from the
promises of God in Christ to our own merit. No wonder they
are the eternal prey of doubt and despair. We depend upon
God for salvation. No wonder that our doctrine
is certified, because it does not rest in our own
strength, our own conscience, our own feelings, our own
person, our own works. It is built on a better foundation.
It is built on the promises and truth of God.
Besides,
the passage from Solomon does not treat of the hatred and
love of God towards men. It merely rebukes the ingratitude
of men. The more deserving a person is, the less he is
appreciated. Often those who should be his best friends,
are his worst enemies. Those who least deserve the praise
of the world, get most. David was a holy man and a good
king. Nevertheless he was chased from his own country. The
prophets, Christ, the apostles, were slain. Solomon in
this passage does not speak of the love and hatred of God,
but of love and hatred among men. As though Solomon wanted
to say: "There are many good and wise men whom God
uses for the advancement of mankind. Seldom, if ever, are
their efforts crowned with gratitude. They are usually
repaid with hatred and ingratitude."
We
are being treated that way. We thought we would find favor
with men for bringing them the Gospel of peace, life, and
eternal salvation. Instead of favor, we found fury. At
first, yes, many were delighted with our doctrine and
received it gladly. We counted them as our friends and
brethren, and were happy to think that they would help us
in sowing the seed of the Gospel. But they revealed
themselves as false brethren and deadly enemies of the
Gospel. If you experience the ingratitude of men, don't
let it get you down. Say with Christ: "They hated me
without cause." And, "
For my love they are my adversaries; but I give myself
unto prayer
." (Ps. 109:4.)
Let
us never doubt the mercy of God in Christ Jesus, but make
up our minds that God is pleased with us, that He looks
after us, and that we have the Holy Spirit who prays for
us.
VERSE 7. Wherefore
thou art no more a servant, but a son.
This
sentence clinches Paul's argument. He says: "With the
Holy Spirit in our hearts crying, 'Abba, Father,' there
can be no doubt that God has adopted us for His children
and that our subjection to the Law has come to an
end." We are now the free children of God. We may now
say to the Law: "Mister Law, you have lost your
throne to Christ. I am free now and a son of God. You
cannot curse me any more." Do not permit the Law to
lie in your conscience. Your conscience belongs to Christ.
Let Christ be in it and not the Law.
As
the children of God we are the heirs of His eternal
heaven. What a wonderful gift heaven is, man's heart
cannot conceive, much less describe. Until we enter upon
our heavenly inheritance we are only to have our little
faith to go by. To man's reason our faith looks rather
forlorn. But because our faith rests on the promises of
the infinite God, His promises are also infinite, so much
so that nothing can accuse or condemn us.
VERSE
7. And if a son, then an heir of God
through Christ.
A
son is an heir, not by virtue of high accomplishments, but
by virtue of his birth. He is a mere recipient. His birth
makes him an heir, not his labors. In exactly the same way
we obtain the eternal gifts of righteousness,
resurrection, and everlasting life. We obtain them not as
agents, but as beneficiaries. We are the children and
heirs of God through faith in Christ. We have Christ to
thank for everything.
We
are not the heirs of some rich and mighty man, but heirs
of God, the almighty Creator of all things. If a person
could fully appreciate what it means to be a son and heir
of God, he would rate the might and wealth of nations
small change in comparison with his heavenly inheritance.
What is the world to him who has heaven? No wonder Paul
greatly desired to depart and to be with
Christ. Nothing would be more welcome to us than early
death, knowing that it would spell the end of all our
miseries and the beginning of all our happiness. Yes, if a
person could perfectly believe this he would not long
remain alive. The anticipation of his joy would kill him.
But
the law of the members strives against the law of the
mind, and makes perfect joy and faith impossible. We need
the continued help and comfort of the Holy Spirit. We need
His prayers. Paul himself cried out: "O wretched man
that I am! Who shall deliver me from the body of this
death?" The body of this death spoiled the joy of his
spirit. He did not always entertain the sweet and glad
expectation of his heavenly inheritance. He often felt
miserable.
This
goes to show how hard it is to believe. Faith is feeble,
because the flesh wars against the spirit. If we could
have perfect faith, our loathing for this life in the
world would be complete. We would not be so careful about
this life. We would not be so attached to the world and
the things of the world. We would not feel so good when we
have them; we would not feel so bad when we lose them. We
would be far more humble and patient and kind. But our
faith is weak, because our spirit is weak. In this life we
can have only the first- fruits of the Spirit, as Paul
says.
VERSE
7. Through Christ.
The
Apostle always has Christ on the tip of his tongue. He
foresaw that nothing would be less known in the world some
day than the Gospel of Christ. Therefore he talks of
Christ continually. As often as he speaks of
righteousness, grace, the promise, the adoption, and the
inheritance of heaven, he adds the words, "In
Christ," or "Through Christ," to show that
these blessings are not to be had by the Law, or the deeds
of the Law, much less by our own exertions, or by the
observance of human traditions, but only by and through
and in Christ.
VERSES 8, 9. Howbeit
then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which
by nature are no gods. But now, after that ye have known
God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the
weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to
be in bondage?
This
concludes Paul's discourse on justification. From now to
the end of the Epistle the Apostle writes mostly of
Christian conduct. But before he follows up his doctrinal
discourse with practical precepts he once more reproves
the Galatians. He is deeply displeased with them for
relinquishing their divine doctrine. He tells them:
"You have taken on teachers who intend to recommit
you to the Law. By my doctrine I called you out of the
darkness of ignorance into the wonderful light of the
knowledge of God. I led you out of bondage into the
freedom of the sons of God, not by the prescription of
laws, but by the gift of heavenly and eternal blessings
through Christ Jesus. How could you so soon forsake the
light and return to darkness? How could you so quickly
stray from grace into the Law, from freedom into
bondage?"
The
example of the Galatians, of Anabaptists, and other
sectarians in our day bears testimony to the ease with
which faith may be lost. We take great pains in setting
forth the doctrine of faith by preaching and by writing.
We are careful to apply the Gospel and the Law in their
proper turn. Yet we make little headway because the devil
seduces people into misbelief by taking Christ out of
their sight and focusing their eyes upon the Law.
But
why does Paul accuse the Galatians of reverting to the
weak and beggarly elements of the Law when they never had
the Law? Why does he not say to them: "At one time
you Galatians did not know God. You then served idols that
were no gods. But now that you have come to know the true
God, why do you go back to the worship of idols?"
Paul seems to identify their defection from the
Gospel to the Law with their former idolatry. Indeed he
does. Whoever gives up the article of justification does
not know the true God. It is one and the same thing
whether a person reverts to the Law or to the worship of
idols. When the article of justification is lost, nothing
remains except error, hypocrisy, godlessness, and
idolatry.
God
will and can be known in no other way than in and through
Christ according to the statement of John 1:18, "
The only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the
Father, he hath declared him
." Christ is the only means whereby we can know God
and His will. In Christ we perceive that God is not a
cruel judge, but a most loving and merciful Father who to
bless and to save us "spared not his own Son, but
gave him up for us all." This is truly to know God.
Those
who do not know God in Christ arrive at this erroneous
conclusion: "I will serve God in such and such a way.
I will join this or that order. I will be active in this
or that charitable endeavor. God will sanction my good
intentions and reward me with everlasting life. For is He
not a merciful and generous Father who gives good things
even to the unworthy and ungrateful? How much more will He
grant unto me everlasting life as a due payment in return
for my many good deeds and merits." This is the
religion of reason. This is the natural religion of the
world. "
The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of
God
. (I Cor. 2:14.) "
There is none that understandeth, there is none that
seeketh after God
." (Romans 3:11.) Hence, there is really no
difference between a Jew, a Mohammedan, and any other old
or new heretic. There may be a difference of persons,
places, rites, religions, ceremonies, but as far as their
fundamental beliefs are concerned they are all alike.
Is
it therefore not extreme folly for Rome and the
Mohammedans to fight each other about religion? How about
the monks? Why should one monk want to be accounted more
holy than another monk because of some silly ceremony,
when all the time their basic beliefs are as
much alike as one egg is like the other? They all imagine,
if we do this or that work, God will have mercy on us; if
not, God will be angry.
God
never promised to save anybody for his religious
observance of ceremonies and ordinances. Those who rely
upon such things do serve a god, but it is their own
invention of a god, and not the true God. The true God has
this to say: No religion pleases Me whereby the Father is
not glorified through His Son Jesus. All who give their
faith to this Son of Mine, to them I am God and Father. I
accept, justify, and save them. All others abide under My
curse because they worship creatures instead of Me.
Without
the doctrine of justification there can be only ignorance
of God. Those who refuse to be justified by Christ are
idolaters. They remain under the Law, sin, death, and the
power of the devil. Everything they do is wrong.
Nowadays
there are many such idolaters who want to be counted among
the true confessors of the Gospel. They may even teach
that men are delivered from their sins by the death of
Christ. But because they attach more importance to charity
than to faith in Christ they dishonor Him and pervert His
Word. They do not serve the true God, but an idol of their
own invention. The true God has never yet smiled upon a
person for his charity or virtues, but only for the sake
of Christ's merits.
The
objection is frequently raised that the Bible commands
that we should love God with all our heart. True enough.
But because God commands it, it does not follow that we do
it. If we could love God with all our heart we should
undoubtedly be justified by our obedience, for it is
written, "
Which if a man do, he shall live in them
." (Lev. 18:5.) But now comes the Gospel and says:
"Because you do not do these things, you cannot live
in them." The words, "Thou shalt love the Lord,
thy God," require perfect obedience, perfect fear,
perfect trust, and perfect love. But where are the people
who can render perfection? Hence, this commandment,
instead of justifying men, only accuses
and condemns them. "
Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every
one that believeth
" (Romans 10:1.)
How
may these two contradictory statements of the Apostle,
"Ye knew not God," and "Ye worshipped
God," be reconciled? I answer:
By nature all men know that there is a God, "because
that which may be known of God is manifest in them, for
God hath showed it unto them. For the invisible things of
him from the creation of the world are clearly seen."
(Romans 1:19, 20.) Furthermore, the different religions to
be found among all nations at all times bear witness to
the fact that all men have a certain intuitive knowledge
of God.
If
all men know God how can Paul say that the Galatians did
not know God prior to the hearing of the Gospel? I answer:
There is a twofold knowledge of God, general and
particular. All men have the general and instinctive
recognition that there is a God who created heaven and
earth, who is just and holy, and who punishes the wicked.
How God feels about us, what His intentions are, what He
will do for us, or how He will save us, that men cannot
know instinctively. It must be revealed to them. I may
know a person by sight, and still not know him, because I
do not know how he feels about me. Men know instinctively
that there is a God. But what His will is toward them,
they do not know. It is written: "
There is none that understandeth God
." (Romans 3:11.) Again, "
No man hath seen God
." (John 1:18.) Now, what good does it do you if you
know that there is a God, if you do not know how He feels
about you, or what He wants of you? People have done a
good deal of guessing. The Jew imagines he is doing the
will of God if he concentrates on the Law of Moses. The
Mohammedan thinks his Koran is the will of God. The monk
fancies he is doing the will of God if he performs his
vows. But they deceive themselves and become "
vain in their imaginations
," as Paul says, Romans 1:21. Instead of worshipping
the true
God, they worship the vain imaginations of their foolish
hearts.
What
Paul means by saying to the Galatians, "When ye knew
not God," is simply this: "There was a time when
you did not know the will of God in Christ, but you
worshipped gods of your own invention, thinking that you
had to perform this or that labor."
Whether
you understand the "elements of the world" to
mean the Law of Moses, or the religions of the heathen
nations, it makes no difference. Those who lapse from the
Gospel to the Law are no better off than those who lapse
from grace into idolatry. Without Christ all religion is
idolatry. Without Christ men will entertain false ideas
about God, call their ideas what you like, the laws of
Moses, the ordinances of the Pope, the Koran of the
Mohammedans, or what have you.
VERSE
9. But now, after that ye have known
God.
"Is
it not amazing," cries Paul, "that you Galatians
who knew God intimately by the hearing of the Gospel,
should all of a sudden revert from the true knowledge of
His will in which I thought you were confirmed, to the
weak and beggarly elements of the Law which can only
enslave you again?"
VERSE
9. Or rather are known of God.
The
Apostle turns the foregoing sentence around. He fears the
Galatians have lost God altogether. "Alas," he
cries, "have you come to this, that you no longer
know God? What else am I to think? Nevertheless, God knows
you." Our knowledge of God is rather passive than
active. God knows us better than we know God. "Ye are
known of God" means that God brings His Gospel to our
attention, and endows us with faith and the Holy Spirit.
Even in these words the Apostle denies the possibility of
our knowing God by the performance of the Law. "
No man knoweth who the Father is, but the Son, and he to
whom the Son will reveal him
." (Luke 10:22.) "
By his
knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he
shall bear their iniquities
." (Isaiah 53:11.)
The
Apostle frankly expresses his surprise to the Galatians
that they who had known God intimately through the Gospel,
should so easily be persuaded by the false apostles to
return to the weak and beggarly elements of the Law. I
would not be surprised to see my church perverted by some
fanatic through one or two sermons. We are no better than
the apostles who had to witness the subversion of the
churches which they had planted with their own hands.
Nevertheless, Christ will reign to the end of the world,
and that miraculously, as He did during the Dark Ages.
Paul
seems to think rather ill of the Law. He calls it the
elements of the world, the weak and beggarly elements of
the world. Was it not irreverent for him to speak that way
about the holy Law of God? The Law ought to prepare the
way of Christ into the hearts of men. That is the true
purpose and function of the Law. But if the Law presumes
to usurp the place and function of the Gospel, it is no
longer the holy Law of God, but a pseudo-Gospel.
If
you care to amplify this matter you may add the
observation that the Law is a weak and beggarly element
because it makes people weak and beggarly. The Law has no
power and affluence to make men strong and rich before
God. To seek to be justified by the Law amounts to the
same thing as if a person who is already weak and feeble
should try to find strength in weakness, or as if a person
with the dropsy should seek a cure by exposing himself to
the pestilence, or as if a leper should go to a leper, and
a beggar to a beggar to find health and wealth.
Those
who seek to be justified by the Law grow weaker and more
destitute right along. They are weak and bankrupt to begin
with. They are by nature the children of wrath. Yet for
salvation they grasp at the straw of the Law. The Law can
only aggravate their weakness and poverty. The Law makes
them ten times weaker and poorer than they were before.
I and many others have experienced the truth of this. I
have known monks who zealously labored to please God for
salvation, but the more they labored the more impatient,
miserable, uncertain, and fearful they became. What else
can you expect? You cannot grow strong through weakness
and rich through poverty. People who prefer the Law to the
Gospel are like Aesop's dog who let go of the meat to
snatch at the shadow of the water. There is no
satisfaction in the Law. What satisfaction can there be in
collecting laws with which to torment oneself and others?
One law breeds ten more until their number is legion.
Who
would have thought it possible that the Galatians, taught
as they were by that efficient apostle and teacher, Paul,
could so quickly be led astray by the false apostles? To
fall away from the Gospel is an easy matter because few
people appreciate what an excellent treasure the knowledge
of Christ really is. People are not sufficiently exercised
in their faith by afflictions. They do not wrestle against
sin. They live in security without conflict. Because they
have never been tried in the furnace of affliction they
are not properly equipped with the armor of God and know
not how to use the sword of the Spirit. As long as they
are being shepherded by faithful pastors, all is well. But
when their faithful shepherds are gone and wolves
disguised as sheep break into the fold, back they go to
the weak and beggarly elements of the Law.
Whoever
goes back to the Law loses the knowledge of the truth,
fails in the recognition of his sinfulness, does not know
God, nor the devil, nor himself, and does not understand
the meaning and purpose of the Law. Without the knowledge
of Christ a man will always argue that the Law is
necessary for salvation, that it will strengthen the weak
and enrich the poor. Wherever this opinion holds sway the
promises of God are denied, Christ is demoted, hypocrisy
and idolatry are established.
VERSE 9. Whereunto
ye desire again to be in bondage.
The
Apostle pointedly asks the Galatians whether they desire
to be in bondage again to the Law. The Law is weak and
poor, the sinner is weak and poor--two feeble beggars
trying to help each other. They cannot do it. They only
wear each other out. But through Christ a weak and poor
sinner is revived and enriched unto eternal life.
VERSE
10. Ye observe days, and months, and
times, and years.
The
Apostle Paul knew what the false apostles were teaching
the Galatians: The observance of days, and months, and
times, and years. The Jews had been obliged to keep holy
the Sabbath Day, the new moons, the feast of the passover,
the feast of tabernacles, and other feasts. The false
apostles constrained the Galatians to observe these Jewish
feasts under threat of damnation. Paul hastens to tell the
Galatians that they were exchanging their Christian
liberty for the weak and beggarly elements of the world.
VERSE
11. I am afraid of you, lest I have
bestowed upon you labor in vain.
It
grieves the Apostle to think that he might have preached
the Gospel to the Galatians in vain. But this statement
expresses more than grief. Behind his apparent
disappointment at their failure lurks the sharp reprimand
that they had forsaken Christ and that they were proving
themselves to be obstinate unbelievers. But he does not
openly condemn them for fear that oversharp criticism
might alienate them altogether. He therefore changes the
tone of his voice and speaks kindly to them.
VERSE
12. Be as I am; for I am as ye are.
Up
to this point Paul has been occupied with the doctrinal
aspect of the apostasy of the Galatians. He did not
conceal his disappointment at their lack of stability. He
had rebuked them. He had called them fools, crucifiers of
Christ, etc. Now that the more important part of his
Epistle
has been finished, he realizes that he has handled the
Galatians too roughly. Anxious lest he should do more harm
than good, he is careful to let them see that his
criticism proceeds from affection and a true apostolic
concern for their welfare. He is eager to mitigate his
sharp words with gentle sentiments in order to win them
again.
Like
Paul, all pastors and ministers ought to have much
sympathy for their poor straying sheep, and instruct them
in the spirit of meekness. They cannot be straightened out
in any other way. Oversharp criticism provokes anger and
despair, but no repentance. And here let us note, by the
way, that true doctrine always produces concord. When men
embrace errors, the tie of Christian love is broken.
At
the beginning of the Reformation we were honored as the
true ministers of Christ. Suddenly certain false brethren
began to hate us. We had given them no offense, no
occasion to hate us. They knew then as they know now that
ours is the singular desire to publish the Gospel of
Christ everywhere. What changed their attitude toward us?
False doctrine. Seduced into error by the false apostles,
the Galatians refused to acknowledge St. Paul as their
pastor. The name and doctrine of Paul became obnoxious to
them. I fear this Epistle recalled very few from their
error.
Paul
knew that the false apostles would misconstrue his censure
of the Galatians to their own advantage and say: "So
this is your Paul whom you praise so much. What sweet
names he is calling you in his letter. When he was with
you he acted like a father, but now he acts like a
dictator." Paul knew what to expect of the false
apostles and therefore he is worried. He does not know
what to say. It is hard for a man to defend his cause at a
distance, especially when he has reason to think that he
personally has fallen into disfavor.
VERSE
12. Be as I am; for I am as ye are.
In
beseeching the Galatians to be as he is, Paul expresses
the hope that they might hold the same affection
for him that he holds for them. "Perhaps I have been
a little hard with you. Forgive it. Do not judge my heart
according to my words."
We
request the same consideration for ourselves. Our way of
writing is incisive and straightforward. But there is no
bitterness in our heart. We seek the honor of Christ and
the welfare of men. We do not hate the Pope as to wish him
ill. We do not desire the death of our false brethren. We
desire that they may turn from their evil ways to Christ
and be saved with us. A teacher chastises the pupil to
reform him. The rod hurts, but correction is necessary. A
father punishes his son because he loves his son. If he
did not love the lad he would not punish him but let him
have his own way in everything until he comes to harm.
Paul beseeches the Galatians to look upon his correction
as a sign that he really cared for them. "
Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous,
but grievous; nevertheless, afterward it yieldeth the
peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are
exercised thereby
." (Heb. 12:11.)
Although
Paul seeks to soften the effect of his reproachful words,
he does not take them back. When a physician administers a
bitter potion to a patient, he does it to cure the
patient. The fact that the medicine is bitter is no fault
of the physician. The malady calls for a bitter medicine.
Paul wants the Galatians to judge his words according to
the situation that made them necessary.
VERSE
12. Brethren, I beseech you ... Ye
have not injured me at all.
Would
you call it beseeching the Galatians to call them
"bewitched," "disobedient,"
"crucifiers of Christ"? The Apostle calls it an
earnest beseeching. And so it is. When a father corrects
his son it means as if he were saying, "My son, I
beseech you, be a good boy."
VERSE
12. Ye have not injured me at all.
"I
am not angry with you," says Paul. "Why should
I be angry with you, since you have done me no injury at
all?"
To
this the Galatians reply: "Why, then, do you say that
we are perverted, that we have forsaken the true doctrine,
that we are foolish, bewitched, etc., if you are not
angry? We must have offended you somehow."
Paul
answers: "You Galatians have not injured me. You have
injured yourselves. I chide you not because I wish you
ill. I have no reason to wish you ill. God is my witness,
you have done me no wrong. On the contrary, you have been
very good to me. The reason I write to you is because I
love you."
The
bitter potion must be sweetened with honey and sugar to
make it palatable. When parents have punished their
children they give them apples, pears, and other good
things to show them that they mean well.
VERSES
13, 14. Ye know how through
infirmity of the flesh I preached the gospel unto you at
the first. And my temptation which was in my flesh ye
despised not, nor rejected; but received me as an angel of
God, even as Christ Jesus.
"You
Galatians were very good to me. When I began to preach the
Gospel to you in the infirmity of my flesh and in great
temptation you were not at all offended. On the contrary,
you were so loving, so kind, so friendly towards me, you
received me like an angel, like Jesus Himself."
Indeed,
the Galatians are to be commended for receiving the Gospel
from a man as unimposing and afflicted all around as Paul
was. Wherever he preached the Gospel, Jews and Gentiles
raved against him. All the influential and religious
people of his day denounced him. But the Galatians did not
mind it. That was greatly to their honor. And Paul does
not neglect to praise them for it. This praise Paul
bestows on none of the other churches to which he wrote.
St. Jerome and
others of the ancient fathers allege this infirmity of
Paul's to have been some physical defect, or
concupiscence. Jerome and the other diagnosticians lived
at a time when the Church enjoyed peace and prosperity,
when the bishops increased in wealth and standing, when
pastors and bishops no longer sat over the Word of God. No
wonder they failed to understand Paul.
When
Paul speaks of the infirmity of his flesh he does not mean
some physical defect or carnal lust, but the sufferings
and afflictions which he endured in his body. What these
infirmities were he himself explains in II Corinthians
12:9, 10: "
Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my
infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me.
Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches,
in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for
Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong
." And in the eleventh chapter of the same Epistle
the Apostle writes: "
In labors more abundant, in stripes above measure, in
prisons more frequent, in deaths oft. Of the Jews five
times received I forty stripes save one. Thrice was I
beaten with rods, once was I stoned, thrice I suffered
shipwreck
," etc. (II Cor. 11:23-25.) By the infirmity of his
flesh Paul meant these afflictions and not some chronic
disease. He reminds the Galatians how he was always in
peril at the hands of the Jews, Gentiles, and false
brethren, how he suffered hunger and want.
Now,
the afflictions of the believers always offend people.
Paul knew it and therefore has high praise for the
Galatians because they over looked his afflictions and
received him like an angel. Christ forewarned the faithful
against the offense of the Cross, saying: "
Blessed is he, whosoever shall not be offended in me
." (Matt. 11:6.) Surely it is no easy thing to
confess Him Lord of all and Savior of the world who was a
reproach of men, and despised of the people, and the
laughing stock of the world. (@Ps.
22:7.) I say, to value this poor Christ, so spitefully
scorned, spit upon, scourged, and crucified, more than the
riches of the richest, the strength of the strongest, the
wisdom
of the wisest, is something. It is worth being called
blessed.
Paul
not only had outward afflictions but also inner, spiritual
afflictions. He refers to these in II Corinthians 7:6,
"
Without were fightings, within were fears
." In his letter to the Philippians Paul makes
mention of the restoration of Epaphroditus as a special
act of mercy on the part of God, "lest I should have
sorrow upon sorrow."
Considering
the many afflictions of Paul, we are not surprised to hear
him loudly praising the Galatians for not being offended
at him as others were. The world thinks us mad because we
go about to comfort, to help, to save others while we
ourselves are in distress. People tell us: "
Physician, heal thyself
." (Luke 4:23.)
The
Apostle tells the Galatians that he will keep their
kindness in perpetual remembrance. Indirectly, he also
reminds them how much they had loved him before the
invasion of the false apostles, and gives them a hint that
they should return to their first love for him.
VERSE
15. Where is then the blessedness ye
spake of?
"How
much happier you used to be. And how you Galatians used to
tell me that you were blessed. And how much did I not
praise and commend you formerly." Paul reminds them
of former and better times in an effort to mitigate his
sharp reproaches, lest the false apostles should slander
him and misconstrue his letter to his disadvantage and to
their own advantage. Such snakes in the grass are equal to
anything. They will pervert words spoken from a sincere
heart and twist them to mean just the opposite of what
they were intended to convey. They are like spiders that
suck venom out of sweet and fragrant flowers. The poison
is not in the flowers, but it is the nature of the spider
to turn what is good and wholesome into poison.
VERSE
15. For I bear you record, that, if
it had been possible, ye would have plucked out your own
eyes, and have given them to me.
The Apostle continues his praise of the Galatians.
"You did not only treat me very courteously. If it
had been necessary you would have plucked out your eyes
and sacrificed your lives for me." And in very fact
the Galatians sacrificed their lives for Paul. By
receiving and maintaining Paul they called upon their own
heads the hatred and malice of all the Jews and Gentiles.
Nowadays
the name of Luther carries the same stigma. Whoever
praises Luther is a worse sinner than an idolater,
perjurer, or thief.
VERSE
16. Am I therefore become your
enemy, because I tell you the truth?
Paul's
reason for praising the Galatians is to avoid giving them
the impression as if he were their enemy because he had
reprimanded them.
A
true friend will admonish his erring brother, and if the
erring brother has any sense at all he will thank his
friend. In the world truth produces hatred. Whoever speaks
the truth is counted an enemy. But among friends it is not
so, much less among Christians. The Apostle wants his
Galatians to know that just because he had told them the
truth they are not to think that he dislikes them. "I
told you the truth because I love you."
VERSE
17. They zealously affect you, but
not well.
Paul
takes the false apostles to task for their flattery.
Satan's satellites softsoap the people. Paul calls it
"
by good words and fair speeches to deceive the hearts of
the simple
." (Romans 16:18.)
They
tell me that by my stubbornness in this doctrine of the
Sacrament I am destroying the harmony of the church. They
say it would be better if we would make some slight
concession rather than cause such commotion and
controversy in the Church regarding an article which is
not even one of the fundamental doctrines. My reply is,
cursed be any love or harmony which demands for its
preservation that we place the Word of God in jeopardy!
VERSE 17. Yea,
they would exclude you, that ye might affect them.
"Do
you Galatians know why the false apostles are so zealous
about you? They expect you to reciprocate. And that would
leave me out. If their zeal were right they would not mind
your loving me. But they hate my doctrine and want to
stamp it out. In order to bring this to pass they go about
to alienate your hearts from me and to make me obnoxious
to you." In this way Paul brings the false apostles
into suspicion. He questions their motives. He maintains
that their zeal is mere pretense to deceive the Galatians.
Our Savior Christ also warned us, saying: "
Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's
clothing
." (Matt. 7:15.)
Paul
was considerably disturbed by the commissions and changes
that followed in the wake of his preaching. He was accused
of being "
a pestilent fellow, a mover of sedition among all the Jews
throughout the world
." (Acts 24:5.) In Philippi the townspeople cried
that he troubled their city and taught customs which were
not lawful for them to receive. (@Acts
16:20, 21.)
All
troubles, calamities, famines, wars were laid to the
charge of the Gospel of the apostles. However, the
apostles were not deterred by such calumnies from
preaching the Gospel. They knew that they "ought to
obey God rather than men," and that it was better for
the world to be upset than to be ignorant of Christ.
Do
you think for a moment that these reactions did not worry
the apostles? They were not made of iron. They foresaw the
revolutionary character of the Gospel. They also foresaw
the dissensions that would creep into the Church. It was
bad news for Paul when he heard that the Corinthians were
denying the resurrection of the dead, that the churches he
had planted were experiencing all kinds of difficulties,
and that the Gospel was being supplanted by false
doctrines.
But
Paul also knew that the Gospel was not to blame. He did
not resign his office because he knew that the Gospel
he preached was the power of God unto salvation to every
one that believes.
The
same criticism which was leveled at the apostles is
leveled at us. The doctrine of the Gospel, we are told, is
the cause of all the present unrest in the world. There is
no wrong that is not laid to our charge. But why? We do
not spread wicked lies. We preach the glad tidings of
Christ. Our opponents will bear us out when we say that we
never fail to urge respect for the constituted
authorities, because that is the will of God.
All
of these vilifications cannot discourage us. We know that
there is nothing the devil hates worse than the Gospel. It
is one of his little tricks to blame the Gospel for every
evil in the world. Formerly, when the traditions of the
fathers were taught in the Church, the devil was not
excited as he is now. It goes to show that our doctrine is
of God, else "behemoth would lie under shady trees,
in the covert of the reed, and fens." The fact that
he is again walking about as a roaring lion to stir up
riots and disorders is a sure sign that he has begun to
feel the effect of our preaching.
VERSE
18. But it is good to be zealously
affected always in a good thing, and not only when I am
present with you.
"When
I was present with you, you loved me, although I preached
the Gospel to you in the infirmity of my flesh. The fact
that I am now absent from you ought not to change your
attitude towards me. Although I am absent in the flesh, I
am with you in spirit and in my doctrine which you ought
to retain by all means because through it you received the
Holy Spirit."
VERSE
19. My little children, of whom I
travail in birth again until Christ be formed in you.
With
every single word the Apostle seeks to regain the
confidence of the Galatians. He now calls them lovingly
his little children. He adds the simile: "Of whom I
travail in birth again." As parents reproduce their
physical
characteristics in their children, so the apostles
reproduced their faith in the hearts of the hearers, until
Christ was formed in them. A person has the form of Christ
when he believes in Christ to the exclusion of everything
else. This faith in Christ is engendered by the Gospel as
the Apostle declares in I Corinthians 4:15: "
In Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the Gospel
"; and in II Corinthians 3:3, "
Ye are the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not
with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God
." The Word of God falling from the lips of the
apostle or minister enters into the heart of the hearer.
The Holy Ghost impregnates the Word so that it brings
forth the fruit of faith. In this manner every Christian
pastor is a spiritual father who forms Christ in the
hearts of his hearers.
At
the same time Paul indicts the false apostles. He says:
"I have begotten you Galatians through the Gospel,
giving you the form of Christ. But these false apostles
are giving you a new form, the form of Moses." Note
the Apostle does not say, "Of whom I travail in birth
again until I be formed in you," but "until
Christ be formed in you." The false apostles had torn
the form of Christ out of the hearts of the Galatians and
substituted their own form. Paul endeavors to reform them,
or rather reform Christ in them.
VERSE
20. I desire to be present with you
now, and to change my voice.
A
common saying has it that a letter is a dead messenger.
Something is lacking in all writing. You can never be sure
how the written page will affect the reader, because his
mood, his circumstances, his affections are so changeable.
It is different with the spoken word. If it is harsh and
ill-timed it can always be remodeled. No wonder the
Apostle expresses the wish that he could speak to the
Galatians in person. He could change his voice according
to their attitude. If he saw that they were repentant he
could soften the tone of his voice. If he saw that they
were
stubborn he could speak to them more earnestly. This way
he did not know how to deal with them by letter. If his
Epistle is too severe it will do more damage than good. If
it is too gentle, it will not correct conditions. But if
he could be with them in person he could change his voice
as the occasion demanded.
VERSE
20. For I stand in doubt of you.
"I
do not know how to take you. I do not know how to approach
you by letter." In order to make sure that he leaves
no stone unturned in his effort to recall them to the
Gospel of Christ, he chides, entreats, praises, and blames
the Galatians, trying every way to hit the right note and
tone of voice.
VERSE
21. Tell me, ye that desire to be
under the law, do ye not hear the law?
Here
Paul would have closed his Epistle because he did not know
what else to say. He wishes he could see the Galatians in
person and straighten out their difficulties. But he is
not sure whether the Galatians have fully understood the
difference between the Gospel and the Law. To make sure,
he introduces another illustration. He knows people like
illustrations and stories. He knows that Christ Himself
made ample use of parables.
Paul
is an expert at allegories. They are dangerous things.
Unless a person has a thorough knowledge of Christian
doctrine he had better leave allegories alone.
The
allegory which Paul is about to bring is taken from the
Book of Genesis which he calls the Law. True, that book
contains no mention of the Law. Paul simply follows the
custom of the Jews who included the first book of Moses in
the collective term, "Law." Jesus even included
the Psalms.
VERSES
22, 23. For it is written, that
Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by
a freewoman. But he who was of the bondwoman was born
after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.
This is Paul's allegory. Abraham had two sons: Ishmael by
Hagar, and Isaac by Sarah. They were both the true sons of
Abraham, with this difference, that Ishmael was born after
the flesh, i.e., without the commandment and promise of
God, while Isaac was born according to the promise.
With
the permission of Sarah, Abraham took Hagar, Sarah's
bondwoman, to wife. Sarah knew that God had promised to
make her husband Abraham the father of a nation, and she
hoped that she would be the mother of this promised
nation. But with the passage of the years her hope died
out. In order that the promise of God should not be
annulled by her barrenness this holy woman resigned her
right and honor to her maid. This was no easy thing for
her to do. She abased herself. She thought: "God is
no liar. What He has promised He will perform. But perhaps
God does not want me to be the mother of Abraham's
posterity. Perhaps He prefers Hagar for the honor."
Ishmael
was thus born without a special word or promise of God, at
the mere request of Sarah. God did not command Abraham to
take Hagar, nor did God promise to bless the coalition. It
is evident that Ishmael was the son of Abraham after the
flesh, and not after the promise.
In the ninth chapter of the Epistle to the Romans St. Paul
advances the same argument which he amplifies into an
allegory in writing to the Galatians. There he argues that
all the children of Abraham are not the children of God.
For Abraham had two kinds of children, children born of
the promise, like Isaac, and other children born without
the promise, as Ishmael. With this argument Paul squelched
the proud Jews who gloried that they were the children of
God because they were the seed and the children of
Abraham. Paul makes it clear enough that it takes more
than an Abrahamic pedigree to be a child of God. To be a
child of God requires faith in Christ.
VERSE 24. Which
things are an allegory.
Allegories
are not very convincing, but like pictures they visualize
a matter. If Paul had not brought in advance indisputable
arguments for the righteousness of faith over against the
righteousness of works this allegory would do little good.
Having first fortified his case with invincible arguments,
he can afford to inject this allegory to add
impressiveness and beauty to his presentation.
VERSES
24, 25. For these are the two
covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth
to bondage, which is Agar. For this Agar is mount Sinai in
Arabia.
In
this allegory Abraham represents God. Abraham had two
sons, born respectively of Hagar and Sarah. The two women
represent the two Testaments. The Old Testament is Mount
Sinai, the bondwoman, Hagar. The Arabians call Mount Sinai
Agar. It may be that the similarity of these two names
gave Paul his idea for this allegory. As Hagar bore
Abraham a son who was not an heir but a servant, so Sinai,
the Law, the allegorical Hagar, bore God a carnal and
servile people of the Law without promise. The Law has a
promise but it is a conditional promise, depending upon
whether people fulfill the Law.
The
Jews regarded the conditional promises of the Law as if
they were unconditional. When the prophets foretold the
destruction of Jerusalem, the Jews stoned them as
blasphemers of God. They never gave it any thought that
there was a condition attached to the Law which reads:
"If you keep the commandments it shall be well with
thee."
VERSE
25. And answereth to Jerusalem which
now is, and is in bondage with her children.
A
little while ago Paul called Mount Sinai, Hagar. He would
now gladly make Jerusalem the Sarah of the New Testament,
but he cannot. The earthly Jerusalem is not Sarah, but a
part of Hagar. Hagar lives there in the home
of the Law, the Temple, the priesthood, the ceremonies,
and whatever else was ordained in the Law at Mount Sinai.
I
would have been tempted to call Jerusalem, Sarah, or the
New Testament. I would have been pleased with this turn of
the allegory. It goes to show that not everybody has the
gift of allegory. Would you not think it perfectly proper
to call Sinai Hagar and Jerusalem Sarah? True, Paul does
call Sarah Jerusalem. But he has the spiritual and
heavenly Jerusalem in mind, not the earthly Jerusalem.
Sarah represents that spiritual Jerusalem where there is
no Law but only the promise, and where the inhabitants are
free.
To
show that the Law has been quite abolished, the earthly
Jerusalem was completely destroyed with all her ornaments,
temples, and ceremonies.
VERSE
26. But Jerusalem which is above is
free, which is the mother of us all.
|